Highly recommended: Chinese is considered a baby language all over the world

From: http://www.freebsdchina.org/forum/viewtopic.php? T = 30355

Before 100, Chinese was considered a baby language
　　
Before 100, the world believed that Chinese was a baby language and later found that Chinese was the most advanced language in the world that had evolved. It turns out that seven thousand years ago, there were also a long-winded suffix and lattice in Chinese. Later we abandoned all the useless things. For example, you can use the word "when" to show the completed actions. There is no need to be so arrogant when it is finished in the past.
In ancient Egypt, the wedge-shaped text evolved into Phoenix, the Ancient Phoenix text evolved into Greek, the Greek Language evolved into Latin, the Latin language turned into French, and the French Language evolved into English. The Latin language becomes the Slavic language family to the east, and the Slavic language family evolves into Russian. At the same time, this is also a history of the spread of religion. It is a process in which the Catholic Church is divided into the Christian and Orthodox Church. Chinese is the only advanced language in the world that does not use letters.
　　
Chinese is the only language that can be used in the computer age. It is the most suitable for voice control, and does not need to be blindly touched like English!
　　
This is a question that determines the fate of the Chinese people. Please publicize it as much as possible! One obvious advantage of Chinese is that there is a wide range of ways of thinking. in mathematics, the monosyllabic pronunciation speeds up the response to numbers. However, it is better to use Pinyin in the aspect of thinking, however, from the perspective of the development trend of human civilization, Chinese as ideographic texts can freely combine new concepts and concepts of nouns to accommodate the impact of information and knowledge explosion, it will undoubtedly develop into a common language of mankind. It is more convenient and colorful to use this language to exchange ideas. Of course, in this paper, the computer language is used in Chinese and pinyin, the greatness of Chinese lies in its compatibility. You can see that academic papers in Chinese have a mix of Chinese and Arabic numerals and Western pinyin texts, but you cannot find a Chinese character in English papers, china's physics experts can use their basic chemistry knowledge in the middle school era to read the papers of chemistry experts. On the contrary, experts from different industries in the United States should exchange their academic achievements, with this advantage, Chinese is eligible to become a world language, and some Chinese scholars still want to make Chinese pinyin. Isn't this a perfect solution? We Chinese people are also qualified to accuse people of so-called civilized Westerners who are making environmental pollution and destroying forests and grasslands, because they are printing a book of the same content, the western language is twice the waste of paper than the Chinese language. The people in the world who use the western language are five times more than the people who use the Chinese language, and multiply by simple factors, A waste of 10-20 times of wood
More than 20 times of industrial waste water, in terms of the superiority of language, Westerners are not qualified to speak Chinese, and even illiterate people know to find Chinese texts from the five working languages of the United Nations, because the Chinese text is the thinnest one.
　　
The Chinese have such an idea that Chinese will sooner or later be eliminated by English. I remember that on one occasion, Hu yeobi simply explained it clearly during the debate. A few days ago, the century lecture hall invited a scholar Li Rui and thought that the result of globalization was to allow English to govern the world. Only Ruan Zishan speaks Chinese at a faster speed than English in a 'big time and little Story. However, he raised another question. Since Chinese uses 'sound' to make Chinese thinking faster than English, there are more voices in Cantonese than in Mandarin, is Cantonese thinking faster than Mandarin? My answer is: Although Cantonese uses more tones than Mandarin, Cantonese has two disadvantages: First, it has poor planning and poor text expression, A closed-syllable sound exists. Second, the voice usage is not high. There are 21 initials, 35 vowels, and 4 voices in Mandarin. The result of concatenation is 2900 voices, but 2500 are available, only 1200 of them are actually used in Mandarin. There are nine voices in Cantonese. Even if its mother and mother are as many as Mandarin, the actual voice should be more than twice that of Mandarin. However, there are only 1500 actually used voices in Cantonese, which is similar to Mandarin, and its utilization rate is almost twice as small as that in normal words. If the utilization rate is small, it means it is hard to learn. Because of the same initials or vowels, each use is actually a kind of exercise process, the high utilization of the initials or vowels must be easy to remember, easy to grasp. In daily life, we can also see that all commonly used language elements, including initials, vowels, Chinese characters and words, are more often used and easier to grasp. The quality of language actually depends on two aspects. First, can we use only a few memories? Second, can we learn more than others in our lifetime? The limit should be: the best language is the language with the most knowledge, or the language with less learning but more knowledge.
　　
English is different from Mandarin. In International Phonetic symbols, there are 20 vowels and 20 consonants in English, so there are no more than 20*20 = 400 English voices. In other words, any voice that is not within these four hundred voices is not recognized by the English language or considered to be incorrect pronunciation. What we call here is not a 'syllable '. After comparison, we can see that the Chinese pronunciation type is three times that of English, and the ratio of the two is far greater than that of Cantonese and Mandarin.
　　
Next, let's explain why the more types of sound, the faster the thinking speed. I discussed this question for a month at the Peking University Chinese forum last year. Here I hope to make it simple. Suppose there is a person who only sends two voices. Specifically, he will send two voices, A and B. According to computer theory, we know that he can still express the whole world with these two symbols. Let us assume that there are only 400 kinds of things in the world that need to be expressed. Then, an British can use every pronunciation to express one of the 400 things, and only send two voices to people, sometimes you have to use nine pronunciations to express one of the 400 things, because the ninth power of two is greater than 400. For example, if the British use 'I to represent' I, but only two voices may use abbababba to represent 'I. It takes about 1/4 seconds for an average person to make a sound. By comparing the two, we can see that only two voices are not only slow but also effort-consuming. When expressing the concept of 'me', the British spent 1/4 seconds, and only two people with two voices used two or 1/4 seconds. If two people always live in this proportion for a lifetime, all the information they enjoy in their lifetime will be inversely proportional. In actual situations, the most obvious difference is the contrast between Japanese and Chinese. We know that Japanese uses 100 different voices, while Chinese uses 1200 voices, therefore, many Chinese characters must be expressed in two or three voices when the Japanese read them. If we assume that all the words in Japanese are expressed in two voices, isn't it true that the information that the Japanese can enjoy in their life is only half of that of the Chinese? I have thought about whether this is related to a great thinker that has never been found in Japanese history. We know that thinking is actually a process in our hearts. If we express our words fast, we should keep thinking fast. In this example, Zhao yuanren used to recite the multiplication speed in English and Chinese. He used Chinese for 30 seconds and English for 45 seconds. Therefore, if two people recite the words in English and Chinese at the same time, the Chinese user will surely think of the ninth or eighth day in 30 seconds, and the English user will not be able to come here. Maybe, he only came up. This proves that the language thinking speed is faster when multiple pronunciation types are used than when the pronunciation types are used. This was once confirmed by many scholars both inside and outside China. Whether or not the speed of thinking is fast represents intelligence, which is recognized by many scholars.
　　
My evidence is to explain why an ancient Greek man is smarter than others in the history of 'mymy? Because the Greek culture is from the ancient phoenicans, we know that the fienski invented the human pinyin letters. In terms of the decomposition of the voice, this is a great progress. In terms of the speed of thinking, it is a great step backwards. In order to filter sound elements that are easy to distinguish, fienski uses only 22 consonants, so that the expression speed is certainly slower than any other language, while the Greek adopt vowels. We know that after the combination of the vowels and consonants, the types of sounds have increased several times. As a matter of fact, there are also vowels in the voice of fienski people, otherwise they will not be able to send out. The so-called 22 consonants mean that they only recognize these 22 consonants as information, that is, ma, me, Mu, Mai, and Muo have no difference with m in their ears, just as the four tones of me have no difference for the British. The sudden increase in voice categories led to the rapid development of Greek thinking, resulting in a later phenomenon. On the Forum, some people asked why there are still more Chinese voices than English, and why the English language is not advanced. My answer is that when there is a sudden increase in the number of voice types, there will be new ideas. On the contrary, when there is a decrease in the number of voice types, the idea will tend to be conservative, and after the Yuan dynasty, the Voice of China lost a sound of "inbound", and China's weakness began from that time. Finally, when talking about the niandte people, people also found that people who use a small number of voices would be eliminated from history.
　　
The reason why I believe that Chinese must beat English is not here, the key is to solve the knowledge explosion problem that humans are currently facing. We know that the current English words, including various biological names and new terms invented by patents, have exceeded millions. If we consider that English has some components that can be deduced and Lenovo; such as prefix, suffix, and compound words, there are also 1 million basic words to be remembered. All these single words can be expressed in four thousand Chinese characters. The root cause is that English pronunciation is not adequate.
For example, pork represents pork in English. It has nothing to do with pig and meat, but only represents a combination of them, if you compare the pork, mutton, Beef beef, lard, goat oil suet and butter talon, all the consortium Words in English are a new sign that has no association with any of them, but they constitute the subject of English words. This is how millions of Words in English come. The root cause of this problem is that if you change pork to a shape that is connected to pig and meat, you need to pronounce it four times and pork only pronounce it twice; therefore, words that are joined together can save pronunciation but increase memory. words that are separated do not need to be remembered, but increase the number of pronunciation times. Imagine that a butcher would use the word 'pork 'thousands of times a day. The words that use two pronunciations would save two thousand times of pronunciation than the words that use four pronunciations. Why? However, when a word is not commonly used, the English language is the same as the Chinese language. The word used for splitting, for example, the donkey meat is expressed using donkey meat. Because of the uncommon words, even if a symbolic form is set up, others cannot remember it. It is very useful for Chinese to break down vocabulary in English. It greatly reduces the number of words to be remembered, it can also clearly organize words in people's minds. The birth of Darwin was built on the dual-name Law of linnai. This method changed all kinds of impressions from the original plane to a three-dimensional one. For example, before linnai, people gave a name to all creatures. As a result, due to too many species, the same creature may have two names, while the other creature may have no name. Linnai first classifies all creatures and gives a class name. Then, put a word under the class name to form the name of the double-name method. This is not only clear, but also greatly reduces the need for memory symbols. For example, there were 10 thousand names, which are now divided into one hundred classes and one hundred in each category, we only need to remember one hundred class names and one hundred class names, a total of two hundred, rather than the original 10 thousand. As the problem of knowledge explosion gradually deteriorates, it is necessary for humans to replace other terms with this method. At present, the only way is to reform according to the Chinese structure. The reason is the number of pronunciation types.
　　
This phenomenon is first realized by laveniz of Germany. He believes that Chinese is a group language that the western world has dreamed of since the times of alicore. However, he did not see the true characteristics of voice, but he defined Chinese characters as the world's most advanced text due to the performance of Chinese characters. I think, if he sees today's world of knowledge explosion, he will surely ask all countries in the world to abolish Pinyin and use Chinese characters.
　　
Finally, let's talk about how many words or symbols A person can remember in his life. Chinese people generally use three to four thousand Chinese characters, while Shakespeare's English only has 30 thousand words, he can grasp all. However, in the Churchill era, he still had 30 thousand words, but at that time he had nearly a million words in English. Therefore, I believe that Shakespeare's proficiency in English words cannot be achieved by future generations. I once asked a lot of language institutions in English Higher Education to learn how many words should be mastered in English. However, their answers are always vague or confused. Later, in some articles that cannot avoid this problem, I found that the requirements of linguistics for English words are: an educated english user should have 5 to 0.25 million words, not only is there a large gap between the two, but, by this standard, both Shakespeare and Churchill should be illiterate, at least uneducated. In my opinion, this is the weakness of anyone who advocates English, as long as they can avoid other people asking this question, other aspects ......
　　
My point of view was discussed on Peking University's Chinese website. However, we can see that there are still many people who do not know. They all think they are inferior nationalities and inferior cultures. Therefore, there are still many things to be done to boost the confidence of the Chinese people. In fact, as long as everyone can restore their confidence, the Chinese people should have been ahead of the world in many aspects. However, we are so keen to catch up with each other when foreigners set up a set of standards. Why can't we set up standards and change their tastes? I remember that a few years ago, Western countries had a problem that they liked to point out their fingers. At that time, I also had a problem-I liked to drag my legs. There is a Cox Report in the United States, which illustrates a large number of comparisons to demonstrate that Chinese people cannot achieve the same results as the one thousand-plus U.S. nuclear tests through three or forty nuclear experiments. The only explanation is that China has stolen American technology. Someone also called this incident Li wenhe. At that time, I sent an email to all the American senator. The content is that if they want to thoroughly investigate the problem, they should set up another research group to study the differences in thinking between Chinese and English. Only in this way can we find out why the progress made by China's three or forty nuclear tests is almost the same as that of the United States's more than one thousand nuclear tests. The letter is followed by my computation book comparing the two languages. Later, I received a lot of replies asking me to tell them my real address before continuing to consider it.
　　
...... I also understand that no U.S. senator will submit any relevant motion, because any motion is a disguised propaganda of Chinese, all of them are poor at English. No Americans are willing to debate it. Obviously, if the debate goes on, it will inevitably involve many problems in speech and linguistics. Each problem is a scar on them. At present, the United States has always asked China to lower the RMB exchange rate, but its attitude is still not beyond the courtesy range. Therefore, this theory is not suitable yet. Once they are beyond the rational, it is very easy to talk about the linguistic issues. In other words, due to the narrow scope of thinking in English, the problem cannot be considered in the longer term. However, I dare not say this, at least to Americans. Because I am an engineering engineer, I am a little certain about engineering, but I have no idea at all when I encounter an economic problem.
　　
Another such thing is to discuss with the BBS. Everyone knows that esban is actually a language used to replace English. Of course, you do not know how to use 'alicloud '. My problem is that the word in English has far exceeded the limit of ordinary people's memory. Is there any way to make up for this defect in eserto? At that time, someone replied to me that the derived structure in the world language is more obvious than that in English. However, when I explained to them the types of sounds in Chinese and the usage of 'alicloud', no one would ever speak.
　　
In addition, there is an English only exercise in the United States that once sought advice from the world. What is my opinion. I told them that your intention to promote English is actually to push American culture to the abyss and destroy American culture. The only way to save you is to re-select a language with a 'tone. For those who have never studied Chinese, they generally don't know what a 'tone 'is, so they have to explain it to them using scales during singing; any 'nginx' in English can change at least eight different voices according to the scale, which is similar to the 'tone. What we mentioned above is actually a weakness of the Americans. If there is no need, I will not touch it. In addition, as China's national strength increases, we can say less and less, because we say more, we give excuses to say that China threatens them.