How do graduate students who are using technical lines publish papers?

The following are some of Baidu's content, which has been integrated by myself and my personal experience. It is regarded as original and does not mean it. I just want to stick it to the top and remind myself all the time !!!

I. How do graduate students publish papers? The following are some suggestions:

1. First, determine the answer: the answer is very important. check whether it is suitable for you.

2. Check documents and outline the content of the paper

Analyzes and reads the selected paper objects, and is good at using charts to express complete information;First, give an outline (to reflect your thinking structure and ask for comments from others) and write a draft, starting with the easiest part in writing.(For example, instruments, experimental methods, and results). extract valuable results and add them to the discussion section to complete the discussion, conclusion, and introduction.

 

3. Check data, perform experiments, collect data, and write papers.

The sooner you start writing, the easier it is.Some studies can write articles first, leaving the results blank, and wait until the experiment has the results filled in (haha, do not think about the computer for the moment );Again, the day at which the experiment starts is when the writing starts.; (Try to) list the experiment results into charts (the chart creation is clear ??? What kind of chart is made to view my personal situation ).

Draft --- not too much grass, how to avoid too much grass:Read the magazine's contribution guide-chart requirements-reference document formats-typographical formats-words require that such results save time and avoid getting lostNext: the first draft should be complete, but do not excessively pursue perfection;It indicates why the study has already been conducted by others and what problems exist (based on literature review, it is not a piece of work !) The whole part of my research is concise and concise. It is better to highlight the importance of materials and methods, and to highlight the repeatability in detail.In order to facilitate the preparation of the dissertation's writing results in the future, and then explain the chart to illustrate how to use the chart to highlight the most important part.

Discussion: The discussion is based on a large number of reading documents and summary, which summarizes the main findings and puts forward limitations for further reference by others. Finally, it summarizes and highlights the importance of my research and does not repeat the preface and results.,

Cite articles that support your arguments, but do not affect or reduce innovation.

(First of all, make sure that the above three points are well done, especially the materials and methods that highlight their importance in the third point are clear; the day when the experiment begins is the beginning of writing. The following is not needed yet)

4. After writing the thesis, consult the tutor and modify it.

The article needs to be modified multiple times. The first time here is the general description that can be included several times until the goal is achieved. The first time is to make the statement clear: whether the expression is complete, whether it can be understood by others, whether the statement is fluent, and the format, punctuation, etc.; Second: the focus of the paper: structure and content coordination. Can the abstract independently support the content of the article? Can the abstract and chart express the approximate content of the study?

Third time: ask others to make it clear: do not let others spend their energy on modifying the typos and format, and consider others' opinions from another perspective.

Post-modification: Check the integrity and logic of the article

It should be emphasized that the order of the article is not the order of completely copying the experiment. We should consider the overall structure framework of the paper and dare to discard unnecessary data.

 

5. After the paper is finalized, find a publication publishing house to publish the paper.

Skill:

You can submit documents on the corresponding website. You can contact and communicate with them before submitting the documents.However, if you do not have any channels, you should first write your papers on behalf of the website to learn about the situation.

 

 

Ii. How does a Master's Degree publish five SCI papers?(Those experiences are very good, especially the methods mentioned in the paper: Most of the papers view the abstract, part of the paper accuracy; first look at the summary to see the implementation of the method; Focus on time to see the literature to save time. The second step is to experiment early: study others' ideas, think while doing, learn to compare and ask questions; view the direction of the thesis published by Senior Brother and Sister)

When I started my experiment,People say how I do it, and every day at the test bench, I think this is a scientific research.Two months later, I suddenly found myself standing in the same position. That feeling can only be described as "frustrated. I began to doubt my behaviors and ideas. I feel that the power of habit is binding me. I am used to people and cloud, and I am used to serving and busy.I am not a graduate student, but a cheap and diligent technician.. Later, I was surprised to see that my fellow students are repeating the same mistake. So I decided to sum up the experience in scientific research and discuss it with you. It is hoped that this will approach scientific research in the true sense. It is hoped that these experiences will become the accumulation of graduate students after a successful trial, so that later people can learn from them and avoid detours and go straight to the essence of the problem.

 

My experiences in Scientific Research (1)

1. Experiment is performed in half time, and literature is read in half time. Never spend all the time on the test bench.Reading documents, reading books, reading others' operations, listening to others' experiences, studying others' ideas, and thinking. Learn to compare, not blindly follow. Otherwise, it will be plagued by some small problems for a long time.

2. The better the preparation, the smoother the experiment. The ancients cloud, sharpen the knife without mistake cut firewood.Early knowledge reserves, document reserves, material preparation, and method preparation can prevent you from getting too busy. The full pre-experiment gives you confidence.. You do not have to start from scratch ". The most intolerable part is the laziness in the first few steps, which may lead to some insurmountable obstacles.

3. The record is authentic and detailed. People are always a bit vanity. It is the practice of many people to only record successful steps or beautiful results to the experiment records. As you may not know, many valuable experiences and unexpected discoveries have passed. An objective, authentic, and detailed record is a valuable asset.

4. Do not save money for the boss.

Efficiency first. It's time-consuming to save money all day. Once an unreliable item is used, it will only waste time and suffer a blow, and it will not save a penny in the end.

5. Grasp the psychological advantages.

All people who have done experiments have experienced failures and setbacks. Some failures should occur in the pre-experiment phase. You can accept them with confidence. If you do not do a pre-experiment, your frustration will be obvious in the formal experiment. If you make incorrect operations due to a rush of time, you will be frustrated. If you are able to put it bluntly because you are currently frustrated, you can avoid the occurrence of tragedy. If you do not know what to do before entering the lab in the morning, you 'd better think about it again. The biggest mistake is repeating the same mistake. Remember, it is not suitable for lab practitioners.

 

My experiences in scientific research (2)

1. Let's take a look at the summary first, and then look at the discussion.

View the summary to find out the concept and view the methods

2. First read the previous articles published by the mentor, and then read the papers answered by the Senior brother and sister.The former knows the general direction (in fact, they should be viewed before their graduate students), and the latter knows what can be used for reference.

3. Early Start

Learn key technologies before leaving

4. If you follow the work of Senior Brother and Sister, you must check that the results of the experiment record are not necessarily credible!

5. Prepare both hands

To clarify the problem, design subjects can write articles whether positive or negative. What is positive and what is negative. If the subject requires a positive result, you may need to design a few parts in advance. In case the first part cannot get the expected result, you can use other parts to compensate for the loss.

 

My experiences in Scientific Research (3)

1. Read the abstract in most articles and the full text in a few articles

I have mastered some full-text query skills, and I often enjoy the full text, so that I don't have time to read the content of the article, so I prefer to read the abstract.There are not many useful full texts. It is a waste to pursue the full text. Of course, reading the abstract is not correct.

2. concentrated time to view documents

Always forget. The more time the document is viewed, the more time the document is wasted. Concentrated time is more easily linked to form an overall impression.

3. Record and Mark

Documents copied or printed are directly marked or annotated with a pen. Document in PDF or HTML format can be highlighted or changed in the text color in the editor. This is another important way to avoid wasting time. Otherwise, you will not see it.

4. Read the articles to be referenced.

The conversion causes are too many examples.

5. Pay attention to the reference value of the article.

The influence factors of publications and the number of cited articles can reflect the reference value of the articles. However, pay attention to how other articles cited in this article evaluate this article: Support, opposition, supplement, and correction.

 

 

 

Higher requirements:

 

I read an article and find out its shortcomings. It is very skillful and an important way to get my own scientific research ideas. Then, how can we improve our ability to discover deficiencies in the paper? There is a way for you to try: Find an article published by Daniel directly in a high-level publication, and find his comment on other good articles in introduction, generally, there will be positive comments and points out their shortcomings. Then, download these articles, read them carefully, and try to evaluate them. Next, let's compare with Daniel's comments to see if you are consistent. If you are consistent, congratulations, you are at a high level. If you are not consistent, congratulations, it's time for you to raise your level: Think carefully, does Daniel's evaluation conform to the actual situation? Why did Daniel evaluate it? How did Daniel come up with it?

In this way, after training dozens of articles, you are sure that the level of taste articles will be improved, and your scientific research ideas will be more open.

How do graduate students who are using technical lines publish papers?