How does one let Linux kill windows?

How does one let Linux kill windows? I admit, this is a bit title. However, this question mark may be a question that many Linux fans do not know how many times they have imagined. to list the many advantages of Linux and the various windows crimes, let people try Linux. But how is the ending? Everyone can see it.
 
Why does Linux fail? Oh, it should not be said to be a failure. It should be said that the share rate is far lower than that of windows? You know, Windows requires a lot of money, and most Linux distributions are free of charge. Is it because people all over the world are stupid? If there is no need for free, do you have to join in to get out of the crowd?

Let's take a look at it from the most common user perspective. Imagine what we will do with computers apart from work?

Internet access. In this way, Firefox on Linux can do this. Of course, this can be done, not perfect. How many webpages are not expanded in accordance with Microsoft's specifications, leading to failure to display Firefox normally? You can endlessly say to users that this is because the website does not comply with the standards and standards, leading to abnormal display of Firefox, While IE is normal because Microsoft is doing something like that. I think few users will try to understand and then endure this discomfort. For them, webpage display is not normal, they cannot use QQ space, they cannot steal food this national activity, it is better to let them hit the computer. Use Linux + Firefox to access the Internet? Let it steal food first!

Game. What I hear most in this field is that there are thousands of games in Linux, which are enough for users to play. I'm speechless. Does it mean that I can also say to many game enthusiasts that you don't have to change any graphics card or CPU, and you can play thousands of games with geforce 2! If everyone follows this suggestion, it is estimated that many hardware manufacturers will burst into tears, and game manufacturers will also go home to plant sweet potatoes. There is no denying the fact that more and more demanding games promote the development of hardware, and the development of hardware in turn promotes the prosperity of games. Without a game, the speed of development of the current hardware is unpredictable. Under the combination of the two, we forced a lot of related technologies such as 3D to develop. We never saw DirectX singing until now? But this is what Linux lacks. Which of the following is the current game masterpiece running on the Linux release? This does not blame gaming vendors for letting them discard the dominant Windows desktop computer and switch to the Linux camp. How much can he do? Gaming vendors are not always required to abandon their own interests for the sake of the Linux business, so that those employees can seek money for a full meal while squatting on the road? But for game enthusiasts, cannot the Call of Duty 6? Cannot play live football? Let me get it!

When we see this, someone may jump out and refute: Isn't it a Windows program? Just install wine in Linux to simulate it? However, for many common users, they only know how to install one by one, and you have them install another wine on Linux, I don't know how many people are playing. In this case, it is easier to directly install windows. What's more, in windows, can I install VMWare for Linux?

After talking about this, let's look back at how much of the benefits claimed by the Linux camp are related to the final end customers? What do Linux open source code do? Most people simply don't know what a compiler is. Isn't it a dream to let them compile their own Linux code? There is also a list of software updates promoted by Linux. How many users know? For them, the so-called software update is just right-click to let Thunder download.

Linux is a smart game and a powerful tool for programmers. However, the most common users may be out-of-the-box users with unclear memory and hard disks. What they need is the most silly thing. They don't have to spend their brains, they just need to click a finger to complete the system. Windows, which can be used by dogs, meets this requirement.

To put it bluntly, Linux is not bad. You have to say that Linux is better, safer, and more conspicuous than windows, and I will not hold a lot of objections. But the problem is that this is not a simple system vs system war, but a competition for integrated solutions. Linux is a good guy, but those three are for Windows. In other words, Windows has bound too many interest chains, so that vendors around it want to give up the huge interest temptation at hand and support the meager-profit Linux, this is definitely not the path of a rational company. This is doomed to Linux in the future, and will not take a large share in the PC desktop market. Although we may never use it for the rest of our lives, we should support it and pay attention to it. Because of its existence, Microsoft will feel another threat, the price of windows is not too high. Maybe, this is the value of Linux for common users.