In my personal use, I think Debian is better than Ubuntu.

In my personal use, I think Debian is better than Ubuntu -- the Linux Release Technology-Debian information. The following is a detailed description. I have always been a fan of Debian. Before installing 4.0, I heard that Google employees use Ubuntu, which is quite popular at home and abroad. Previously installed once, because the irqpoll parameter of startup cannot be installed on the old machine. It's hard to install the tool. Do you just add the same Gnome interface with a gorgeous coat without technology? The installation and deletion management of the supporting software makes me feel a little bit redhat. The hardware support is good, but it is similar to Debian. In the same core and module, Debian is everywhere in the program running in terminal. Is it not your own business, but your own advantages? Are you afraid of getting jokes? What does Ubuntu really belong? What have they contributed to the open-source community? I do not deny Ubuntu's contribution to Linux promotion. For those who have never been in touch with Linux, Ubuntu is truly user-friendly and can be reflected in the installation process. Although it is much slower than deploying Debian with the same disc on a M memory machine. Ubuntu 7.04 occupies 230 MB of memory at the first startup. Swap also accounts for 100 M. The first time Debian 4.0 was started, 180 M was used, and Swap was not moved! I don't know how many useless services have been started by Ubuntu. Many new software with bright eyes already exists in the new Debian version.

There are too many details. I think Debian is doing better than Ubuntu. For example, root password. I do not know how to enter Ubuntu root except sudo su. I feel that Ubuntu is another Microsoft. Their ambitions can be seen from the absence of. com domain names. For example, a Chinese font. After Debian is installed, you only need to select the Locale of zh_CN and immediately enable Iceweasel. The Chinese font displayed basically cannot tell whether it is a Windows Font, while Ubuntu is the eye-catching ghost. I don't know if all the money raised by Ubuntu is artistic? Go to Apple. There is a desktop effect option in the menu. Click it and the screen is white. So I quit. Fortunately, there was no crash. Press esc and you will see that the dialog box was originally a test! This is too unprofessional. But it's no wonder that a new version will be available six months later.

Ubuntu is hard to count if it is not professional enough. Take the installed partition for example. The gparted feature of Gnome was simplified by Ubuntu, And there was almost no other good stuff left. In addition to fast response and rapid installation, Debian's semi-graphic interface provides many functions.

Ubuntu is not useless either. I think it is more suitable for beginners who just use Linux. If you don't have a free cd from Ubuntu, many people may be reluctant to even use it. Of course, beginners do not know how to install without a disk, especially if there are more than seven Debian (in fact, you only need to download one or a smaller base system to install a usable system ). Ubuntu is also a member of the Debian family. It will be easier to use Debian later. Well, I am working on Debian in my spare time. Most of the mixed meals use Visual Studio on the Windows platform. To be honest, Windows platforms, even Win95, are countless times better than Ubuntu or Debian I like. The world is like this. You think Microsoft software is too expensive to use. But I 'd rather buy it. Why? Easy to use, save time, and make things available to everyone, and there is a class to go.

I don't think I can use Ubuntu anymore. Simply put, do not be confused by the appearance, be impulsive, or be a primary or secondary hobby or positive business. You are welcome to leave a comment.