Statement: This article is only my personal opinion. If you have different opinions, you are welcome to make a picture.
I learned from Nokia N900 that there was a Maemo system, but I certainly didn't have a chance to play with a Meamo-like machine. Of course, it is said that the performance is still OK, and then later, of course, before Meamo and Moblin are merged, I have heard of the Moblin system. When Android is developing better, Moblin and Meamo are merged, then we came out with MeeGo, a leader, a Nokia leader, and an Intel leader. In theory, this is already a very powerful lineup, but let's look at the results ...... It's really shameful.
In webOS, HP is a big guy in the pc market, but what about the mobile phone market? In addition, the webOS of Plam cannot be recognized in the market when it is not acquired, and at the beginning, it does not produce GNET mobile phones. This is a foolish market means, in addition, I do not recognize the shape of my mobile phone. I think many people share the same opinion with me, and the products are similar ...... You must know that you are not an apple. You do not have the capital to compare with others. apple's mobile phone creation has started from nothing, but plam and hp are both experienced. When I was in high school, I liked hp's window mobile products, so I had a lot of experience. On Capital hp, however, webOS was too big, and mobile phones and tablets, in addition, with only one family, the hp family is sticking to it and wants to earn money again. In addition to the popularity of IOS and Android, webOS is developed with html5 + js in terms of software, developers are familiar with the technology, but the promotion is not good ...... How many people have downloaded the package?
WebOS sdk? I once liked this OS, but I never liked this OS product. The first webOS product came out, and I was so sad. So I am dead ......
How did Android start? Andy was acquired by Google when he created android. How many people will know when he acquired android? How many people know Before G1 is produced? However, we should all know that Google held the Android Development Competition before the production of G1, and invested a lot of money, a system's OK must have software support, can a smartphone without software be regarded as a smartphone? So the emergence of the emerging thing G1, coupled with a lot of software, has been successful in G1, coupled with htc's production capacity, followed by the rapid generation of products, at the time of the emergence of G1, international network companies in China were already developing Android software quickly. Coupled with the open-source Android, the success of Android is self-evident.
At the beginning of Windows Phone 7, only HTC produced two mobile phones, and there were quite a few pieces of software, and the system functions were not OK. This is also widely accepted, in addition, the HD7 mobile Phone itself has some problems, so many users have been cold on Windows Phone. But now? Is it because of Microsoft's strong R & D capabilities? Has no one ever commented that windows phone is dead? Now it seems that ms has also achieved a market share, and the number of software is also growing. Later, Samsung followed up ...... Of course, other vendors will certainly follow up. Of course, ms is also rich, but in this field, if you use the same method, plus Nokia's production capacity and market strategy, MeeGo will be at least more likely to succeed than windows.
Phone is too high.
MeeGo's mom and dad (intel and nokia) are both big models, and Nokia has always been a product battle, and they are a large number of products. In my opinion, I have made a lot of achievements, and the quality is not bad. There is always a suitable one for you. How to compare HP? So webOS is dead, and I don't feel bad anymore. MeeGo, you have a eldest son (ghost), which is not very small. It has attracted worldwide attention and gained recognition from both appearance and inner, but it just came out soon, nokia TM won't use MeeGo, Nima. Do you know that MeeGo talents are being recruited in large numbers when I see it in China and abroad? Even if you stick to it, do not give up so early. I use my machine and sea tactics to reproduce one or two products. Of course, I know Nokia is no longer as elegant as it was before, but do you think you can sell Symbian products now? Let's look at Meizu. One M8 bought hundreds of thousands, and win
In ce's system, how much will the middleware sell if it does not quit MeeGo? Will Nokia have fewer fans than Meizu? Instead of making another half-dead, half-dead System Mobile Phone such as Symbian, why don't we use MeeGo, a very promising plug-in to test the market. Now programmers are very productive ......
Secondly, MeeGo uses Qt for development and Qt has a place in the embedded field. Therefore, there are already many potential developers. In addition, this is a business opportunity, so every developer will not miss it, in addition, Qt has the kde linux desktop product. Of course, the software in the future will only increase and not decrease. In addition, the linux desktop market is also very popular, and Ubuntu has contributed a lot. Also, the children's shoes that wayland knows must understand that if wayland develops, what is the concept of linux desktop, and what is the concept of linux desktop for Microsoft windows. This series of technologies are promoting the development of the entire industry. Of course, there may be a disruption in a few years. I am looking forward to the arrival of that era!
Products promote consumption and consumption promote the IT market. Nokia is too anxious. Even if you develop wphone now, there are HTC and Samsung bosses on the market. If you develop meego, three-hearted companies like Samsung will soon produce meego products, and HTC will keep up with meeg products. Of course, let's look at Samsung Bada. How many people are there? However, people still don't give up and don't give up. Compare with you, is it too early to give up? Of course, Samsung is just so rough, and Samsung is still very cool without a mobile phone, but what is your position in the wphone market? Comparison with HTC and Samsung ...... You have lost your competitive strength ...... Are you afraid to repeat the error that Moto insisted on that old system? Of course, the accumulation of Moto is more of a factor in the product. People are still living, so you may not succeed if you have more products like Moto, but you are engaged in the current market strategy, and you are basically playing an atomic bomb ......
Because of money, Nokia's shareholders thought about money, so they gave up the money ...... Has the current strategy gained more? I don't know what will happen in the future. I only want to post what I want to say ...... This is my personal opinion. Please make a picture!
Reprinted, please declare the source! Author: diaoer http://weibo.com/mxdiao