Internet entrepreneurship is under siege

Just like our ideal, the network, after experiencing a painful transformation, shows the strength of the new economy and changes the traditional thinking and habits of more and more people to invest, start-up, operate, and consume, the accessibility of the right to know has challenged the fraud and monopoly of traditional businesses. At the same time, many new models have been created. This is why the Internet economy has gradually entered the practice stage, the last resistance against various banners is shameless to the point of being ridiculous.
Monopoly: first, the internet operating environment has fallen into the hands of telecom operators with a monopoly. The cost is not high, and the service quality is simply intolerable! The north-south split of the expensive region competition, tile hit is the customer. The result of the competition is to let the customer buy two tickets with poor quality, this inexplicable competition, two words ...... Abnormal!
In addition, wireless cable is like a real estate developer operating on the internet. It provides stores to entrepreneurs. Once a field opens up amazing potential, the monopolizer forced the original entrepreneurs to exit in the name of technical means and policies. From real estate agents to shopkeepers, the monopoly agencies that are currently running Caobao are actually unable to manage these industries, therefore, there is a serious waste of time and resources. SP, VOIP, IPTV ......, Regulation is the right of the country and is often used by commercial institutions to conceal monopoly and incompetence.
The country is vigorously advocating scientific and technological innovation, and the current passion for innovation is also high, but why internet companies suffer a massive loss of more than 90%, in addition to the immature nature of innovators, to a large extent, it has nothing to do with an extremely abnormal business environment. The first is the high cost of a bigger and stronger environment, and the second is the case where "commercial organizations" want to serve as referees, if you want to play, you can play. Entrepreneurs who are brave in scientific and technological innovation are often suspended for competition and other results. They can continue to play well only when the commercial referee fails. If they can play well, their competition results will be plundered.
Technology and Innovation entrepreneurs on the Internet are following TV, telecom, newspaper ...... And so on. I recently sent an advertisement to an authoritative TV station. The reason for my rejection was that my website was suspended with a banner "promoting enterprise informatization construction with all possible efforts" on the grounds that: what qualifications do you have to promote informatization construction. An eye-catching TV station that does not know how much the advertising fee is, the director of the advertising department should count as the official product! Is there any necessary link between promoting informatization construction and commercial advertisement review?
 
Policy siege: it is undeniable that the internet is very nonstandard for information dissemination, and some of them are illegal. However, over the past decade, China's Internet has become increasingly mature and standardized, it is accelerating to become a part of social life. The contributions and influences made to the progress of society as a whole are also valuable. Under the national law, a self-disciplined Internet is becoming clearer.
However, the response from the technology, law to the thinking and consciousness supervision system is relatively lagging behind, which also sets a great threshold for Internet science and technology innovation. From the many regulations and regulations introduced in the past, it is not hard to see that the functional departments skilled in traditional business supervision are very uncomfortable with Internet regulation implementation! At the same time, I am reluctant to engage in effective measures such as "hearing" and "joint construction" with innovators who are familiar with the Internet, as well as making unsmiling clauses in a closed-doors manner, even a one-size-fits-all approach. If it is difficult to dance with the monopoly, there is still hope in comparison with the lagging policy and one-size-fits-all approach.
Scientific and technological innovation is advocated by the state, and the internet has not been defined as a "special industry". But who knows Internet companies, except for normal licenses, how many creden are required for normal business?