A friend recommended a Website: Internet forest, which looks like an environmental protection website, to answer 10 questions. Each question includes an environmental protection arrangement, such as how much carbon dioxide emissions can be reduced by using energy-saving bulbs, if you give the answer to emissions reduction, and finally calculate how much carbon dioxide emissions you have reduced, you can use these emissions in exchange for small trees.
My result is:
Thank you for your participation! Today, you have reduced carbon dioxide emissions by 2406.1 grams.
It is equivalent to planting 0.13148 trees to absorb the corresponding carbon dioxide.
Currently, 556,585 trees have been planted in the Internet forest.
From the perspective of publicity, it may be a good website, but from the perspective of environmental protection, this website is indeed contrary to each other.
First, the style of the entire page is white, and it shows that the white tone is the most expensive. That is to say, accessing this website may consume more electricity than accessing other content by computer users, and of course, the emissions are even greater.
Second, the problem is used to earn emissions. This is not a problem. If someone is persistent in the number of trees, the more trees there are, the larger the carbon dioxide emissions, is this forest?