Introduction to PPT Classification

If the classification of the form issue is unclear, it is easy to confuse the concept. For example, if the PPT is a good question of Multi-Point words or few words, the results cannot be discussed if there is no classification concept, or make a wrong conclusion. For example, the PPT should contain as few words as possible. Is this principle correct? If it is correct, some people may have doubts. When they get a PPT without explanation, they only see beautiful pictures, and they have no help in understanding the overall meaning, is such a PPT well designed?

Therefore, I think that classification and definition of PPT form is the basis for discussion. What are the categories of PPT forms? Let's start with the PPT function.

1st categories of PPT: Speech assistance

The auxiliary class of PPT speech is what we call presentation. At present, some foreign theoretical principles of PPT design are basically aimed at this class. We can simply put it into practice. We usually need to project it and then give a speech to the speaker.

2nd PPT categories: reports or documents

PPT reports or documents do not need to be projected or publicly spoken. There are two subdivisions: electronic files or printed files. For example, a report sent to the boss or the customer, the research results, and the courseware used by the students for self-study. When readers such as superiors or customers have doubts, the producer will explain a certain page or part of the page, but it is usually for reading.

3rd categories of PPT: Automatic demonstration

Automatic PPT demonstration is basically used for reading and does not need to be explained. It may need to be projected. For example, some background information should be provided before the meeting starts, automatic playback of product presentations or company presentations. There are also those that do not need to be projected, such as photo sets circulating on the Internet and inspirational humorous stories. I often receive such PPT in my mailbox.

4th categories of PPT: Miscellaneous

This type of PPT is often used to fully explore the functions of the PPT and make some other applications, such as interactive questions, score statistics, and games. There is nothing unexpected but impossible to think about.

It makes sense to discuss issues after a clear PPT design classification. I believe that the design of each type of PPT has a focus and its principles. For example, for report document printing, you must consider the layout, text, and image combination of the PPT. Try not to use large images without the PPT background, because the printing time and cost are very important, the key to success is that readers can fully understand your ideas and enjoy reading. For electronic documents of PPT reports, you can consider color matching. For example, the automatic PPT demonstration class can focus on the techniques of PPT animation presentation, Image Selection, and text. Miscellaneous classes may focus on technical aspects such as VBA ......

The form of PPT is not an auxiliary type of speech, and there is no need to restrict it to this type. We also need to digest and absorb the advanced theories and the so-called principles of masters abroad. The comments and appreciation of any PPT must be based on its classification, and the PPT Design Principles of the auxiliary class of the speech must be used to comment on the PPT of the report document. How can we get the correct results?

The key is that we should not confuse the categories of PPT and use them incorrectly. The current situation is that we do not realize the importance of classification of PPT form, and there is no classification research, the report document type PPT is often used as an auxiliary speech class, or after reading some experience and skills, I feel that I have mastered the essence of the PPT, I submitted the PPT of the auxiliary speech class as a report document class. After reading it, my boss thought it was inexplicable and told him that he didn't understand the PPT. Some people also regard the PPT animation technique as a technology everywhere. It seems that a PPT has no technical content without exquisite animations, and so on. I think these are the reasons why I did not apply the PPT classification. What is wrong is not the animation technology or VBA, nor the large and small texts, the large and small pictures. What is wrong is that we use the wrong scene.