Is csdn a false (Entertainment) person or an error (Entertainment )?

Since I was about to download a book from csdn at the end of last year, I registered it, but it was not until I recently sorted out my learning materials, I felt that I needed to find a place to save the accumulated data for many years, so I thought of csdn again. So I wrote a blog day and night and learned the popularity rankings, I learned about the expert points... available score ..., so I learned the points rule...

 

Then I gradually fell in love with the so-called rankings and kept replying to the posts. I wanted to get a variety of scores, and I had to delay my study and research plans. These days were even more intense and I felt quite wrong. From this point of view, csdn may not be a game, and everyone is so addicted to ranking. I think this is also the success of csdn designers. Is this true for csdn false (Entertainment) People or my own mistakes (Entertainment )?

 

I think csdn itself will not confuse people (entertaining), just like drugs, if you don't touch it, it will not be able to make you addicted. Csdn experts are like the cloud, which is fascinating. However, human resources are limited and cannot be followed one by one. Therefore, you must stick to your own practice plan, not to mistake yourself in csdn for pure score.

 

The way of learning, you are persevering, accumulating less and more, even the earning points are not the same. I will always come to csdn, but it won't be as self-mistaken as it was a few days ago.

 

I shared my word with Zhu Jun.