Is the software training I am engaged in really a very non-streaming profession?

In the later stage, I added that I am most criticized by netizens for giving students interview questions and saying that they are thieves and scammers. Here, I will explain my interview questions to students as follows:
(1) The student came to the teacher with the interview questions. The student had no way to think about and try it in advance, and he was eager to seek help from the teacher. Out of curiosity about the subject and technology, and out of feelings for the students, the teacher worked tirelessly to help with the problem. Knowing that a child cannot do it on his own doesn't help the child, so he has to exercise the child to do it on his own. Now, it is estimated that many fathers cannot do it on their own. What's more, the students are our customers. We don't want to help them. It seems so cool and heartless.
(2) Some people say that they should let the students do their jobs by themselves. If they cannot do anything, they should not go to the Recruitment Unit to pretend to be good guys. Helping students do their questions is to encourage students to cheat and do evil! From this point on, it is indeed a bit difficult to do things, but it is too heavy to describe things with deception and evil. After all, the employer is not a fool. Can an employer hire a migrant worker to submit the result? The employer had some basic technical assessments and exchanges with the students before doing the exercises. They certainly thought it was almost the same, so that the students could take the questions back home. After the students did the exercises, I also want to explain the code ideas to them. As long as the students can clearly explain the code ideas, the employer may not really care whether the students did it by themselves or if they had some help, because the recruitment positions of many organizations are not right for people, as long as they can handle the tasks they have arranged at work, whether they are handled by themselves or by foreign aid, what the company wants is the result of the incident. Many of my elders have been assigned "Deputy General Manager" in some big companies. Is this elder brother really capable of "Deputy General Manager? No matter whether they have them or not, they can fulfill what the "Deputy General Manager" wants to do based on their own relationships. This is the company's purpose. In the same way, no matter how students do it, as long as the students do it, it means that they or their friends can solve the tasks assigned to him by the company in the future, no matter how he solves it? This may be what the company wants. If so, we have met the company's needs. How can we say that we are cheating and doing evil!
(3) My old idea is: to share the knowledge of the technical problems that I have spent time researching and solving, in order to achieve greater personal and social values. If a person spends a lot of time and energy figuring out the knowledge only in his own stomach and does not have the opportunity to apply it, then this knowledge has no value, only when a knowledge is used by many people and used repeatedly can the value of this knowledge be maximized. Therefore, I have published all these questions and solutions. To attract more people to learn, I certainly want to tell you that this is an interview question and an interview question that determines the success or failure of my work, this is also an incentive to improve everyone's enthusiasm for learning this topic. I didn't expect it to be sent to the cross of moral judgment.

 

I have been living in a dream that I feel good about myself and have a bright future prospects. One of my friends and high-end shareholders told me the day before, some high-end people do not have an eye on my personal and my work, in particular, I saw a series of blog posts that I helped students with interview questions: "Lenovo Litai's interview questions with a monthly salary of 7 k-traffic light Management System" and "another soft power 7 k monthly salary interview questions-banking business scheduling System and my interview questions twice-mobile user fee statistics system, they all think that what I did with Chuanzhi podcast was to do something that could not take the top of the screen, so that they could not get into the stream, so that they could not face those high-end people, he originally wanted to talk about cooperation with those high-end people, and advised me to maintain a clean, dignified, serious and elegant image as a "small and influential celebrity" in the industry, when my company grows bigger in the future, people may attack me and my company with my words and deeds today. After hearing this, I was not depressed and had no intention of repentance. I could not do it. I did not have the talent and cultivation that Mr. Li was. I was on the ground when I was in the sky, but I will not do Tang Jun, nor do I do a Jiao (packaged as pure and cute by the Emperor's company, secretly and Edison Chen shot a film, as an ambassador in public, the ambassador warned the public not to have sex before marriage.) I am the real one! I admit that I am not elegant at all, but I don't think I can't do anything. How many founding emperors are elegant gentlemen? Are not all green forests? Can Zhu Yuanzhang sit on the throne of the emperor, not because he was born as a beggar? Can those elegant intellectuals be the founding emperors? Most of them will also be a adviser, and the highest level is Prime Minister! As the saying goes: "It's not three years because they are too keen on the image and face to do things.

Do some people with elegant appearance and words and deeds in front of the public not eat fireworks? Who knows, like those famous program hosts, is it true that they will start taking selfies after they have taken off their suits? I just want to show the truth and tell you some real things in society. What I lose is elegance, but more people see the real status quo of society, let more people who need our help find us. As for the elegance or not, it is the failure of Wang. At the beginning of Yu Minhong's business, isn't it just a poster crawling a wire pole? Yu Minhong is now a great contributor. He no longer needs to work out the unelegant but effective advertising methods by himself. His own advertising method naturally becomes an elegant line.

Some people say that I have no moral bottom line and I am not worthy of being a people's teacher. I want to clarify that I am not a people's teacher because I do not have a teacher certificate issued by the State. It is similar to the unlicensed Jianghu langzhong because it is indeed effective to treat people, it is called a doctor. I don't know what morality is in this society. I only know that I will take the initiative to give a seat to the elders and children on the bus. I never spit on the street, I never ran a red light. I also dreamed that if I became the president of the country, the first thing I would do most easily would be to catch all those who ran the red light for ten days and a half, there are still no people who throw the red light, but I have not become the president of the country, and now I have hardly seen anyone who can't throw the red light in our great motherland capital, Beijing, if I don't run the red light, I will be treated as a dumb, so sometimes I also run the red light. I admit that my morality has declined, because, for the thing that I cannot change, my current approach is to obey and adapt. What have you done for morality? As for how I help students with questions, I don't think I have to bear the cross of moral judgment. What has New Oriental been doing for so many years? Isn't that about giving students an English question every day? Luo Yonghao introduced a few jokes when teaching various questions! How many educational institutions do not start with people's realistic goals? Do not all primary and secondary school training institutions offer scores for students? If education and training institutions do not take this realistic goal as their starting point, they will not survive in the fierce market competition, and they will be abandoned by customers by teaching students to answer questions, have you ever made two listed companies, New Oriental and xueersi? Teaching students to do questions is not a mistake of educational and training institutions, but a mistake of the Chinese Ministry of Education. It is caused by the nature of people in an impetuous society who want to judge me, please try Chinese Minister of Education first!

I also want to talk about the learning significance of teaching people to do questions. I initially thought that I didn't need to do things, and this thinking was formed in high school. My IQ belongs to the kind of smart but not especially intelligent, no matter how hard I work, I certainly cannot take the test of Tsinghua University, and I have never studied hard, but my academic performance is still good. I think it is mainly because the learning method plays a role, so I can get twice the result with half the effort. When I was a senior high school teacher, I was engaged in questions and tactics. Every week I was engaged in various questions. I often handed in blank papers and even despised some of our high school teachers because I thought I had done everything I could, it is a waste of time to repeat the questions. After the scores of the college entrance examination were obtained, I also "Sincerely" suggested to our high school teachers: "There is no need to repeat so many questions. It is enough to clarify the ins and outs of every knowledge ", the teacher said that I am a special case and will not discuss how to teach. At the beginning, I wrote books and lectures, but I also did not attach any exercise questions after class. Although some students often take the initiative to ask for exercises after class, I always say with a strong voice, I understand the book or the classroom, and I don't need to do any questions. After several years of software training, I found that more than 95% of the students are used to questions. If you don't teach them to do questions, you will not deserve to be a good teacher and you will not be able to establish a foothold, reluctantly, I quickly adapted to market demands and realized the advantages of doing the questions. Some people hear that the teacher is doing interview questions and immediately think that the teacher and the taught person are both very abusive and low-level interesting. noble people should not do such things. However, most people still belong to ordinary people. They work hard to achieve a certain inlofty purpose. Most of the students learn only to get a good result, it is not intended to achieve a great ideal. Otherwise, the school does not need to take an exam. I believe that most people engaged in software development want to make more money, the so-called hobby is also based on the non-noble purpose of being able to make money. The people who really want to learn programming due to their crazy hobbies are, but not much, are you? Although many people learn about software development, the starting point is not noble, but because of this innoble goal, he began to study hard, rather than being idle because there is no goal. In the course of software training, the interview questions constantly cater to the psychological needs of the learners, and offer them an exciting teaching measure to improve their enthusiasm and motivation for learning, otherwise, he may give up learning or the learning effect will be compromised.

Some so-called high-end software developers think that the software training we are engaged in is not very smooth and can't be promoted. It is not worth mentioning. I would like to ask these high-end software development experts, what are you doing? Do games and entertainment tools provide spiritual opium for Chinese people and consume their will and youth? Is such a career really high-end and elegant?

I will continue to post various materials related to external training. I just want to subvert the secular prejudices of some software companies and individuals against training companies and trainees!