Declaration, I am also the first contact thread, write thisArticleIt is not intended to share learning experience.
1. Why is the domestic version?
The original article is an implementation task. It means that two threads operate on one data simultaneously.
One thread completes operation, releases the lock, and the other thread operates, releases the lock, and loopsProgramEnd
The waiting method is
In order to achieve the opposite effect, we changed the original program
One thread waits for the other two threads to complete and then executes the operation
And use the wait (object) Method
And Relevant prompts are written for reading.CodeCan Understand the thread execution Method
2. GiveSource code
Using System;
Using System. Collections. Generic;
Using System. text;
Using System. Threading;
Namespace Threadmonitordemo
{
Class Monitorclass
{
Private Int N = 1 ;
Private Int M = 1 ;
Private Int Max = 10 ;
Private Object Creatern = New Object ();
Private Object Craeterm = New Object ();
Public Void Producen ()
{
Lock (Creatern)
{
For (; N < Max; n ++ )
{
Console. writeline ( " Release n = " + N. tostring ());
// Monitor. Pulse (creatern );
Bool Isreleasen = Monitor. Wait (creatern );
Console. writeline ( " The consume caller re-acquires the creatern lock. " + Isreleasen. tostring ());
}
}
Console. writeline ( " Producen run over " );
}
Public Void Producem ()
{
Lock (Craeterm)
{
For (; M < Max; m ++ )
{
Console. writeline ( " Release M = " + M. tostring ());
// Monitor. Pulse (craeterm );
Bool Isreleasem = Monitor. Wait (craeterm );
Console. writeline ( " Consume re-acquires the createrm lock. " + Isreleasem. tostring ());
}
}
Console. writeline ( " Producem run over " );
}
Public Void Consume ()
{
Lock (Creatern)
{
Lock (Craeterm)
{
While (M < Max && N < Max)
{
Console. writeline ( " Receive n = " + N. tostring () + " M = " + M. tostring ());
Monitor. Pulse (craeterm );
// Monitor. Wait (craeterm );
Bool Isreleasem = Monitor. Wait (craeterm, 500 );
Console. writeline ( " Producem re-acquires the craeterm lock. " + Isreleasem. tostring ());
Monitor. Pulse (creatern );
// Monitor. Wait (creatern );
Bool Isreleasen = Monitor. Wait (creatern, 500 );
Console. writeline ( " Producen re-acquires the creatern lock. " + Isreleasen. tostring ());
}
}
}
Console. writeline ( " Consume run over " );
}
}
Class Program
{
Static Void Main ( String [] ARGs)
{
Monitorclass m = New Monitorclass ();
Thread tproduce = New Thread ( New Threadstart (M. producen ));
Thread tproducem = New Thread ( New Threadstart (M. producem ));
Thread tconsume = New Thread ( New Threadstart (M. Consume ));
Tproduce. Start ();
Tproducem. Start ();
Tconsume. Start ();
Console. Readline ();
}
}
}
3. IntroductionA small opinion on the monitor class
The monitor class is a monitor literally. In fact, each operation of the monitor class is also a separate thread.
When several threads work at the same timeThe monitor class coordinates the work order and helps the thread to transmit messages.
AndMonitor.The wait method has a returned value. On msdn, it is true.
If the call is returned because the caller obtains the lock of the specified object again, the value is true. If the lock is not retrieved again, this method will not return.
In my understanding, if other threads obtain the Lock of this object and display the notification to other waiting threads through the monitor. Pulse (Object OBJ) method, true is returned.
Otherwise, false is returned.
Cause: the execution result is as follows when I do not display the pulse notification.
And wait 500 milliseconds for each execution.
To cancel monitoring. Pulse (craeterm); the execution result after the preceding annotation is
Each executionMonitor..::.Wait MethodReturns true.
And there is no waiting interval between the intermediate time
It seems that only the last time
SoMonitor. We can understand the return value of the wait method in this way.
If other threads obtain the Lock of this object and display the notification to other waiting threads through the monitor. Pulse (Object OBJ) method, true is returned.
Otherwise, false is returned.
4. execution sequence of the analysis program based on the code execution result
I drew a picture because I was not clear about it.
We should be able to see clearly the sequence of program execution.
This figure illustrates the sequence of program execution andMonitorThe object is controlled by a separate thread and plays a regulating role.
But there seems to be a problem just now:
In consume (), use the timeout wait mode isreleasem = monitor. Wait (craeterm, 1000 );
There was a last wait Phenomenon
Why ???
I haven't figured it out ....
If the original author is interested, he can study it together.
Okay, that's it.
I hope you will criticize and ,,
Source ThreadMonitorDemo2008-07-31.rar