problem:
Numbers can regarded as product of its factors. For example,
8 = 2 x 2 x 2; = 2 x 4.
Write a function that takes an integer n and return all possible combinations of its factors.
Note:
- Each combination ' s factors must are sorted ascending, for example:the factors of 2 and 6
[2, 6]
are, not [6, 2]
.
- You are assume that n are always positive.
- Factors should is greater than 1 and less than n.
Examples:
Input1
Output
[]
Input37
Output
[]
Input12
Output
[ [2, 6], [2, 2, 3], [3, 4]]
Input32
Output
[ 2, +], [2, 2, 8], [ 2, 2, 2, 4], [2, 2, 2, 2, 2], [2, 4, 4], [4 , 8]]
Analysis:
This problem isn't hard , could was easily solved through DFS method. However, I came up with a very complicated method initially. Initial Idea:each factor must be consisted through multi prime numbers, thus we could dissect theNInto a collection of prime numbers. Step1:compute the collection of prime numbers forN. (which must be unique). Step2: Use the elements on the collection to generate various combinations. The above idea was right, but it was too complex. According to problem, asLongAs the factor is not 1, we could include it. Thus, we not we Do This?considering the process of dissecting a number: (((2) * 3) * 5) * 6 = 180Suppose our target isWe can first chop out factor 2. Then our target becomes 90. Then we canContinueThe process, until our target Reachs 1. (which means we fully factorize it). Since ThisProblem asks us to compute all such combinations, we should alsoTryTo chop out factor "(((2) * 3)" "(((2) * 3) * 5)". This process could is elegantly achieved through:<at present, we is in "helper (ret, item, N, i)" > for(inti = start; I <= N; i++) { if(n% i = = 0) {... helper (ret, item, n/I, i); ... }} So elegantly, right?A. for(inti = start; I <= N; i++), searches through all possible numbers through start-to-n.note:you may ask since"1" is not a allowed in the combination, so we allow I <= N. Even n*1 is allowed, and in the recursive process, it no longer the N as the initial one. 2 (current N) of 4 (inital N), apparently we-should allow I-be n, otherwise, we would never reach the base Case.-------------------------------------------------------if(n = = 1) { if(Item.size () > 1) {Ret.add (NewArraylist<integer>(item)); } return;}-------------------------------------------------------Note the Caseof "N * 1" would never include in to the RET set, since we require "item.size ()" must larger than 1. So elegant and smart? Right!!!!Also Take advantage of item' s size!!!! Great programming skill!B. (N% i = = 0), guarantees the current I was a factor. C. Helper (ret, item, n/I, I), makes us toContinueThe search with updated target "n/i". Note:since the same factor could appears repeatedlly, we should start from"I" rather than "i+1".
Solution:
Public classSolution { PublicList<list<integer>> Getfactors (intN) {List<List<Integer>> ret =NewArraylist<list<integer>> (); Helper (ret,NewArraylist<integer> (), N, 2); returnret; } Private voidHelper (list<list<integer>> ret, list<integer> item,intNintstart) { if(n = = 1) { if(Item.size () > 1) {Ret.add (NewArraylist<integer>(item)); } return; } for(inti = start; I <= N; i++) { if(n% i = = 0) {item.add (i); Helper (ret, item, n/I, i); Item.remove (Item.size ()-1); } } }}
[leetcode#254] Factor combinations