Linux OS is easier to use than other releases

The Linux operating system is still quite common, So I studied the Linux operating system and shared it with you here. I hope it will be useful to you. In fact, I have never liked Linux, but recently I Like It. As for why, it may be because its SHELL is powerful enough. But if I switch from WINDOWS to Linux, I am not used to it. Which release version should I choose? So I chose VMWARE, the Linux operating system, and try installing it in the virtual machine first.

Red hat fedora CORE2 xandros desktop redflag desktop 4.1 LIINSPIRE 4.5 KNOPPIX Linux operating system 3.2

I feel that the REDHAT Linux operating system has the most integrated software and has the most powerful functions. However, what I cannot figure out is why REDHAT does not take a long time to look at the desktop, because the Chinese font displayed on the REDHAT desktop is too bad, and the interface is not beautiful, there are too few GUI configuration tools.

However, the startup LOADER of FEDORA2 has finally become beautiful. The elegant and elegant LOADER animation can also display/hide the boot information, which is really good. however, its GRUB boot program is very idiotic. In the past, when it was installed in 9, it was first installed in 2003 and then in 9. After the installation, both of them can be guided. I thought the same was true for FEDORA2. However, after installation.

Guide 2003, but found that, chainload error, made me install again, this time did not dare to use GRUB as the boot program, had to use 2003 OS LAODER as the boot program, it's also perfect. I checked the dog. It turns out that this is a big BUG of FEDORA, which is too exaggerated. Such a big BUG actually appeared in the release version.

It seems that REDHAT technicians work only after drinking WINE. XANDROS has good compatibility with WINDOWS because it integrates WINE. Although it is not possible to install WINE in other Linux operating systems, but after all, not everyone will install software in the Linux operating system. In other aspects, it is generally a good redflag desktop, and finally it can be a sigh of relief for the Chinese.

First of all, the interface is similar to WINDOWS, so it is easier to get started and easier to use than other releases, whether from the boot load screen or from the BOOT progress box displayed on the KDE, they are similar to XP. Of course, they are not just similar to God, but also the control panel under WIN, or even the right-click menu arrangement, they are very similar to WIN.

In this way, it is very kind for the users who switch windows to the Linux operating system. simply relying on this, it will attract a lot of attention. In addition, the biggest advantage of REDFLAG is that it has moved the tedious configuration work in Linux from the command line to the GUI mode, which I like very much, such as the task manager, which allows you to conveniently manage tasks.

The PS, TOP, and KILL commands are unnecessary. In addition, adding and deleting programs allows beginners to add and delete RPM software packages, which is much easier to manage than REDHAT software packages. In short, redflag desktop 4.1 has many exciting features. in my opinion, if the Linux operating system is in this direction, it will be a good direction.

The Linux operating system is powerful, but it cannot attract more FANS without improving ease of use and packaging. combining functions with ease of use is just the way to go. In addition, the ASIANLinux operating system developed by REDFLAG and a Japanese Linux operating system company is also in progress, it is worth looking forward to. LINSPIRE 4.5 Is LINDOWS, which cannot be reached by Microsoft and changed its name. Although it is called LINDOWS, the gap between LINSPIRE and WINDOWS is not small.

In my opinion, REDFLAG is only used for REDWINDOWS. However, LINSPIRE is relied upon only by copying a name, I don't know if REDFLAG's GUI Design and Operation design will be defended. The KNOPPIX interface looks good. I was attracted when I used it for the first time, and its functions are definitely not weak, I used the LIVECD version. At that time, I was surprised because a CD could be integrated with so many software.

In addition, it supports Internet access through ADSL and ISDN, and also supports TV. It does a good job. Basically, all functions can be done through the GUI. In addition, it is not required for new users, it is also a good way to understand the power of the Linux operating system. I always talk about the GUI. It is estimated that many people have already laughed at me.

It seems that only cainiao are afraid of command line. The old birds are dismissive of the GUI. But, in fact, MAC and WINDOWS are so red ??? Is it a command line? NO. NO. NO, isn't it? The Linux operating system lacks a good GUI. Many people compare KDE with WINDOWS desktops.

But have you ever seen a desktop that is so easy to crash? Some people also say that the Linux operating system is better, because it can be used to deliver the display to another machine. This is a self-Consolation. What is the actual point of comparison between your strengths and others' weaknesses, the Linux operating system desktop is far from enough.

1. The Linux operating system is facing the increasing competition between Oracle and Novell
2. Start the service during Linux operating system configuration
3. Linux uses the actual physical hard disk as the Virtual File System
4. To learn about Linux, we recommend that you start with Fedora.
5. Linux operating system Redhat series and Debian Series