Linux Versus Windows, Ubuntu/mint V XP/VISTA/7

Original: Http://petermoulding.com/linux_versus_windows_ubuntu_mint_v_xp_vista_7

Linux Versus Windows, Ubuntu/mint V XP/VISTA/7 submitted byPeter on Tue, 2013-10-22 12:16

I am writing in Libreoffice 4.0.2.2 on Linux Mint, with Cinnamon 2.0. The combination beats all previous versions of Linux and Windows, except for Windows XP 64. Here's the reasons why.

Windows XP?

Windows XP is supported by the most open source projects and I can continue to use my old Windows XP $ machine for anything S Oftware related. Some hardware Suppliers still supply drivers for XP while others has dropped support. XP is no longer viable for new machines. XP is no longer a valid choice.

My XP Machine works with months at a time without problems and wins for reliability on old hardware. XP runs some programs not available on Linux and wins a ongoing place among my existing computers if not on any new comp Uter.

I used the XP machine for WEB Development so one of the critical apache/mysql/php software trio decided to not a support X P. At, point I, moved the last of my Web development onto Linux. Some aspects of Linux on the desktop is painful compared to XP. Linux beats XP as a Web server but not as a desktop Web development operating system.

Linux in general

Almost every bit of software I use was free open source. It all works on Linux and the most of it works on Windows. Some of the best software works on Windows because it started on Windows. Filezilla is the best FTP program and Filezilla are from Windows. For me, the Linux became viable when Filezilla developed a Linux version.

Winmerge is the best of breed file and directory comparison program on the planet it's currently only on Windows, a Stro ng reason to stay on Windows. Meld is the closest Linux equivalent and is still to behind Winmerge. Meld works for small projects then slows down, or crashes, on medium size projects. Winmerge continues to operate fast and efficently on projects many times larger than what Meld can handle.

The Filezilla and winmerge examples are typical of open source. A few years ago, Meld physically could not doing what Winmerge does but open Source/linux/unix bigots kept telling lies about Meld being a complete substitute. Meld could does only a tiny fraction of what winmerge could does and only for a tiny fraction of the file/directory size. Over the years Meld improved. Meld can now handle most of my projects without crashing but it's still incredibly slow on the large projects and still C Rashes on some tasks. Give Meld Another year or both to catch up.

Linux developers seem to deny the truth for years when secretly trying to upgrade their software to the standard of the C Ompetition. It is their lack of openess about development direction This made Linux so hard-to-use on the desktop, you could not plan For now or the future.

The

Today Most of the software is comparable. Apple went through the process of pretending to being better while quietly replacing their inferior hardware with the Hardwar E used by Windows. Linux is almost there. They started by replacing servers. There is absolutely no reason for any new server to use any operating system other than Linux. The desktop is 99% there.

LibreOffice is a good example of the 99% replacement syndrome. For general use, LibreOffice replaces Microsoft Office and LibreOffice works on every useful operating system. Microsoft Office has some extra features for specific professional uses. You can replace the Microsoft Office with LibreOffice for some people. Think of an office with dozens of people using Microsoft office and some of the people using Visio for simple illustration s and one person using Visio for advanced illustrations. You cannot easily replace Visio for the one specialist. If you replace the Microsoft Office with LibreOffice for everyone else, you get compatibility problems until everyone can Reva MP every document into LibreOffice. The conversion could take a year. You are ongoing problems incorporting the special illustrations from Visio to LibreOffice documents. The result is a mess for a long time.

The best approach are to convert people from proprietary software to open source while still on Windows then identify the P Eople and applications you cannot convert. In most cases, you can convert all the people in a department then replace Windows with Linux on the next hardware upgrade .

Windows Vista

Windows Vista was almost dead when released. Vista worked when installed by the manufacturer on fast new hardware if failed for upgrades and is too slow for most exi Sting hardware. The security changes were a disaster. Vista is the biggest single cause of conversions to Linux. Vista was a loser.

Windows 7

Windows 7 returned windows to XP reliability and efficiency, almost. Windows 7 had problems upgrading machines from Vista, you were better off wiping Vista and starting fresh. Many people replaced Vista with XP then successfully upgraded XP to Windows 7.

Windows 7 had some of the Vista style performance problems and you could switch off fancy effects in the user interface to Restore XP style performance on older hardware. Windows 7 with effects switched off are equivalent to some of the Linux user interfaces with effects switched off.

Windows 7 had some of the Vista permissions problems and had hard-to-find ways to fix permissions. Windows 7 is about equal to Linux on security difficulty.

If Microsoft had delivered windows 7 instead of Vista, about a hundred million people would still be using Windows instead of switching to Linux or OSX.

Windows 8

Windows 8 starts with the Metro user interface and you can switch Metro off. If you had only a touch screens, use Metro with the big flat buttons. Apple liked Microsoft Metro so much Apple copied it and called it OSX 7.

If you have a real keyboard instead of a touchscreen, switch off Metro. Some computers has both keyboard and touchscreen. You can switch to Metro at any time once your learn where the control is hidden.

Windows 8 is about equal to the Ubuntu Unity interface with users split between loving and hating the change. I hate Unity on every device, touch or not, small or large. Windows 8 Metro is better than Unity-for-touch only devices in a wide range of screen sizes. Windows 8 wins on touch screens and can switch to a Windows 7 interface for everything else.

Os x

OSX was pretty and annoying, the sort of like Windows Vista. You had-to-work hard-to-make OSX-as good as Linux at a time when Linux was traling Windows, making OSX a distant third.

IOS 7 copies the Windows 8 Metro interface in a attempt to catch up to Microsoft. If you had a touch screen, the IOS 7 user interface was about equal to Windows 8. Apple has not offered the IOS 7 clone of Windows 8 for OSX. Linux is a better choice because you can choose the user interface you want.

Ubuntu Linux with Unity

Ubuntu is the leading version of Linux for the desktop then they replaced the user interface with their Unity software. The first version of Unity is as bad as Microsoft Vista. The current version is better and works efficiently only on touchscreens of a medium size in a landscape format.

For everything else, the Unity still produces problems with layout. On large screens, you is forced to search for things that should is there on the screen. The Unity interface have all the problems of Windows 8 metro and OSX without the options to fix the problems.

The next version of Unity might finally has good user customisation but does not bet on it, Canonical, the people behind Un ity, is moving the other, removing user options.

The one big change on the future is the Ubuntu phone. A telephone manufacturer in India are about to release a smartphone based on Ubuntu. The Chinese government is promoting Ubuntu on China and could release an Ubuntu based smartphone. An Ubuntu based desktop makes sense when you have an Ubuntu smartphone.
Ubuntu Linux with Gnome (no effects)
I tried replacing Ubuntu Unity with Gnome then switched effects off. The result worked for Ubuntu 13.04 and is a disaster after an upgrade to Ubuntu 13.10.

I reinstalled Ubuntu 13.10 from scratch but the process is messy and failed frequently with operating system level errors . I gave up and installed Linux Mint, with the Cinnamon user interface. Linux Mint based on Ubuntu 13.04 with Cinnamon 1.8 preinstalled instead of Unity.
Linux Mint with Cinnamon 2.0
Ilinux Mint based on Ubuntu 13.04 with some nice improvements. Linux Mint and the Cinnamon user interface has Cinnamon 1.8 preinstalled instead of Unity. I installed Linux Mint Cinnamon and found only one trivial error during installation.

After installation, I immediately upgraded Cinnamon to version 2.0 and ran into only one slight hiccup during the Changeov Er. The first time you start version 2.0, it's a little bit slow at first. After the first start, it's almost as fast as the fastest alternative and faster than most of the alternatives.

Linux Mint with MATE

MATE is a alternative to Cinnamon based on Gnome 2 instead of Gnome 3. MATE is a bit primative compared to Cinnamon and is trailing Cinnamon development. MATE is slightly faster for some things and could are a good alternative in a year or both. For now it's less useful than Cinnamon 1.8 and Cinnamon 2.0 are already available.

I can see a speed difference between MATE and Cinnamon on my little netbook but not on my ultrabook. The limitations of MATE is not work on the speed difference.

Linux Mint with XFCE

XFCE is lighter in weight than mate/cinnamon/unity, almost everything. I can see the speed difference between XFCE and MATE in my little netbook but not on my ultrabook.

XFCE have significant differences to Cinnamon. I am using Cinnamon on my ultrabook. It is too difficult to switch between Cinnamon and XFCE. I may sell the netbook instead of trying to switch back and forth. I might also give Cinnamon 2.0 a test on the netbook because 2.0 are supposed to being faster than 1.8 and may make Cinnamon V Iable on the netbook.

XFCE is improving but, like MATE, is improving to slow for me.

Android

Android is a strong alternative version of Linux for smartphones with touchscreens. Android works n the desktop is a oriented to touchscreens, isn't real keyboards and large scale desktops. The Android installation process does not cover all my configurations of computers and I am not going to use Android on Ju St one or both computers.

Debian

Debian Linux is a good the base for Ubuntu and the other derivatives are too crude for desktop use. You end up installing all the extra things installed by Ubuntu and Linux Mint. You might choose Debian for a server. Start with Linux Mint on the desktop.

Red Hat? Fedora?

Red Hat Linux is the big competitor to Debian for corporate server use. Fedora is their spinoff for desktop use. Fedora is comparable to Linux Mint with a different range of user interfaces. Both Fedora and Red Hat struggle to keep market share.

CentOS is a cleaned to version of Red Hat for servers. CentOS used to being the main choice for servers and are losing out to Ubuntu. Forget CentOS, Red Hat, and Fedora.

Conclusion

Linux Mint with Cinnamon 2.0 are the winner for new computers and Windows XP is a equal for old computers. Everything else needs extra work.

Linux Mint has the widest range of user interfaces. If you had a chance to test them all side by side, use Linux Mint with the user interface of your choice.

Windows 8 is a close second if you know what to switch Metro off and on. You might choose Windows 8 if you have a Windows 8 based smartphone.

Windows 7 is a viable repalcement for XP when your XP machine dies and you could have to perform a clean install of 7 Instea D of an upgrade. For most people, the Linux Mint is already a alternative you should try before buying Windows 7.

Ubuntu was a good choice before Unity. You can replace Unity on Ubuntu and the result is unreliable. Linux Mint is a better choice.

OSX is another choice and you had to install extra software to make it as good as Ubuntu or Linux Mint.