May God bless you, and Microsoft successfully passes the test

On April 9, July 9, the head of the ISO Technical Management Board (TMB) proposed to reject the appeals from four countries and settle the lawsuit. His reason is very clear that the ISO act in accordance with the regulations, and most p-Member States vote, therefore, the appeal should be terminated. The ISO Technical Committee is scheduled to vote on the matter on December 31, August 4.

The voting on August 4 requires that each appeal p-Member State be held separately, because they have different appeal reasons. If the appeal grounds of a p-Member State cannot be rejected, a special coordination committee will be established to settle the matter. The attitude of ISO is clear. It is useless to say what you want. The ISO skin is very thick and not afraid of ironing (this sentence is not a saying, I mean it .).

Today, odf1.2 and OpenOffice. org3.0 are coming soon. The latter also supports Microsoft office2007 document formats (using importfilters). The ODF and openxml are closer to each other. The global software industry is moving forward. Why should we fight for it and help the people hurt the money? In the face of Microsoft, It is a battle. There are two development ideas: a win-win situation, and a war is all hurt. I am not afraid of "surrender". I am nothing more than a "person! What about nai I?

On September 10, July 9, the US bestbuy chain store sold the box ubuntu8.04 and stabbed windows. On the same day, joepanettieri stated that: It turns out that many customers do not want to buy an operating system to go home and install it on their own. No matter how easy the installation process of this operating system is, bring a lot of cold water to the boxed ubuntu. I feel the same way. Looking back (more than 20 years of PC computer development history), Microsoft's success lies in "pre-installation", which is far more powerful than "installation" (by the user. In last May, Dell launched the Ubuntu computer. A large number of users have not uninstalled Ubuntu so far, which is a victory. This year, many small computers with pre-installed Linux are taking the same path, as are self-starting USB flash drives. Microsoft has created a PC containing an operating system, and the vast majority of users around the world accept this difficult change. It is difficult to use "Easy installation" to challenge "pre-installation.

Why do you want to protect Microsoft Security? In my opinion, for the sake of openxml, Microsoft swallowed up and made a lot of concessions. We should see this. Microsoft opens APIs and documentation for many products, giving competitors a chance to survive. If Microsoft is not afraid of competition and is engaged in "interoperability", we should respond. Microsoft has made an international standard (openxml). We are afraid to say that there is a ghost in our hearts (the ghost is also selfish .). Microsoft is a friend and a competitor. This is in line with the spirit of Olympus! Of course, I know that Olympus is not a place for commercial interests.

China's software industry lacks competition. No wonder Microsoft. We are not united by ourselves. We like to whisper behind the scenes, and it cannot be a major event. I admire Microsoft's generosity. If you criticize it, I will not speak. We need to learn from Microsoft's spirit.