Mr Xie: How to play the Rubik's Cube, first take ant community to say things

The community read "Mr Xie, Keso and wheat fields," after the conversation, triggered a lot of thinking. has not been fully understood, because Mr Xie left a problem-that is the Rubik's Cube. Mr Xie himself also said that he is good at strategy, even the tactics are still not enough, and I care more about this Rubik's Cube play. Give you a six-square-aligned Rubik's Cube, you will praise its wonderful, but give you an upset Rubik's Cube so that you put six face qi, it is not so easy.

What touched me most in Mr Xie's conversation was the idea that the more the internet resembled real life, the more promising it was. It seems to me that it is not a mapping and simulation, but a penetration, not like online games to create a vision to let you into it, but as a part of your real life. This "elephant" is not a formal image, but the internal organization law must follow the same law as the real life. In this sense, MySpace is not the ideal community, compared to Apple's itunes more potential, but it has not fully develop its social organization potential.

What is WEB2.0, a human center? I think that it's not enough to be human, or that light is going to be a problem in people-centric terms-who is the principal? If the Web site builds a platform for individuals to operate on top of each other and create value added through individual interactions, what value does the site itself provide here? What is the interaction of an individual driven? How does the value added to the interaction result in evaluation? Who pays for the added value generated? Community is actually need to solve these problems, I understand that the community is the network social system, it is not facing people, but the crowd, it needs to do is not to create products to provide services, but to build systems, control resources. In the face of personal service, such as blog, can not promote and form interactive value-added. In the face of the people's service, it can form the sustainable development of the resource ecological circle.

What's the difference between a man and a crowd? "People" think more about the individual as the center of demand, emphasis on personality and publicity, such as blog space, personal collection, albums and so on; and "crowd" emphasis is the group will and interpersonal relationship, this aspect is actually doing well not much, some 2.0 of the site has some signs, but are "people" This leads to the development of, not in depth planning. Take the circle of friends, the idea is very good, but the site is just a group of loose people circled up, but did not really form a friend of the interaction, the site will feel very innocent, will think that the circle of people, interaction is the user's own things. But actually, whether the interaction can produce value is actually the structure and system of the website. Now many sites are "information" to aggregate people, to tag and search technology, but this model is not in place, the fundamental reason is--people have, but the relationship between people is not fully reflected. The embodiment of the human relationship is now familiar to two kinds, one is subject aggregation, which is to bring together people of the same preference to talk about common topics and interact; another is the so-called SNS, through interpersonal relationships to form a network, adhering to the "friend friend is friend" principle. The former is not deep enough, the latter user cost is difficult to control, the effect is not very good. Refer to the "Internet closer to life," the principle of the two are still from the formation of the actual social relationship between the law has a certain gap, on the one hand is "like" degree, that is, the wheat field said the "complexity", on the other hand is the user costs (refer to "digg.com, voting

Pulled a bit far, the above question will be written back to the detailed analysis, looking back at the ants. Make some suggestions for ants.

Ant's topic polymerization way is good, also played a certain role. But the relationship between people and people, the relationship between people and groups, the relationship between group and group is not obvious enough. Of course, in the initial stage of information aggregation, the embodiment of some social relations is not so important. But there are some things to consider. such as "friend", this inside if you can add a bit of user path tracking, you can improve the socialization of users. For example, I focus on an article, and then focus on the author, click on the author, to enter his profile page, add him as my friend, then the other should receive a message "xxx read your" XXXXXX "article, very appreciate, hope to add you as a friend", And if I click from the author's friend to enter one of his friend A's files, choose a as a friend, then the other party should receive a message "I appreciate your friend's XXXX article, learned from him that you are his friend, I would like to know your friend." And if I click on his friend and add as a friend from my own friends ' file, the message is "I am a friend of xxx, I hear you are also his friend, I also hope to know you".

In this way, the user's behavior can be transformed into a dominant embodiment of interpersonal relationships. Later, you can also consider based on these path analysis and interactive behavior between users (reply to the other side of the main paste, answer questions, participate in a topic discussion, participate in joint discussion, etc.) to carry out a quantitative description of interpersonal relationships, for individuals, this quantitative results can determine the ranking of their friends list, Even later, the weight of some commercial applications, for groups, can be based on these basic information, group behavior guidance and business application aggregation. The complexity, then, is multiplied by the accumulation of individual behavior, and at the same time the cost of the user is low, and he does not need to use the so-called six-degree space to carry out the complex management of interpersonal relationships. If the latter, with the simple and ingenious design of commercial applications, it can form a sustainable social ecological circle. In this kind of social ecology circle, the ant's builder finally has to do only to excavate the user's demand, carries on the statistical analysis, and according to the result carries on the macroscopic resource deployment, promotes the individuality development and the group interaction, and gradually forms its unique social culture. (Author: The source of thinking: Ant community)