?
You can vote for 10 votes. If there are 10 links, one link and one vote. Now we add the five links to nofollow. Instead of getting two tickets for each of the remaining five links, we still get one vote. Therefore, we cast a total of five votes.
What about the remaining five votes? Don't forget, this page has 10 votes. Isn't it a waste of five votes? Or another way of saying, five votes, no, disappear, evaporate, disappear... In my understanding of Chinese, I think it is a waste of five votes.
From another perspective, if the five nofollow links are not nofollow links, there are two possible scenarios:
1) The five are not links. Then the 10 votes will be for the remaining 5 links, each with 2 votes.
2) the five links are common links. Then, we get one vote for each of the 10 links. These 10 votes either increase the PR and weight of other pages on the site, enter the positive cycle, or increase the PR and weight of other website pages. In short, there are 10 votes and 10 votes are cast out.
I had 10 votes, but I had to vote for five votes. The other five votes disappeared. I still think it is a waste of money. To be honest, I didn't understand what Guoping's logic of "nofollow is useful" is that "nofollow won't waste PR and weight.
Guo Ping also mentioned in his post on the Dianshi Forum:
"Maybe my blog will close comments later" is also wrong.
This is just my emotion. I have no suggestions or predictions about the meaning of closing comments.
Finally, the last sentence of my original sentence is "I don't have to be arrogant first". Why? Because I do not believe in the role of nofollow and the flow of PR and weight, as Google itself said, we generally understand.