Ora, Debian, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and OpenSolaris

In the desktop operating system field, Windows and MacOS monopolize the vast majority of the market. Linux, BSD, and other systems can only be isolated, but their release versions are quite rich, in addition to the most common Ubuntu versions, there are also Fedora, Debian, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and OpenSolaris. Today we will compare these different versions from the performance perspective. Participants (64-bit):-Fedora12: use the latest version from 2010-01-14

In the desktop operating system field, Windows and Mac OS monopolize the vast majority of the market. Linux, BSD, and other systems can only be isolated, but their release versions are quite rich, in addition to the most common Ubuntu versions, there are also Fedora, Debian, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and OpenSolaris. Today we will compare these different versions from the performance perspective.

Participants (64-bit version ):

-Fedora 12: use the latest version of 2010-01-14, Linux 2.6.31 kernel, GNOME 2.28.1 desktop environment, X Server 1.7.1, GCC 4.4.2 compiler, and EXT4 file system.

-Debian GNU/Linux: Linux 2.6.30 kernel, GNOME 2.28.2, X Server 1.6.5, GCC 4.3.4, and EXT3.

-Debian GNU/kFreeBSD: FreeBSD 7.2 kernel, GNOME 2.28.2, X Server 1.6.5, GCC 4.3.4, and UFS.

-FreeBSD 7.2: it is mainly used to compare with Debian GNU/kFreeBSD. FreeBSD 7.2 kernel, GNOME 2.26.0, X Server 1.6.0, GCC 4.2.1, and UFS.

-FreeBSD 8.0: the latest stable version of FreeBSD, 8.0 kernel, GNOME 2.26.3, X Server 1.6.1, GCC 4.2.1, and UFS.

-OpenBSD 4.6: kernel version 4.6, GNOME 2.24.3, X Server 1.5.3, GCC 4.2.4, and FFS.

-OpenSolaris 2009.06: Based on the Solaris Nevada 111b and 5.11 kernels, GNOME 2.24.2, X Server 1.5.3, GCC 4.3.2, and ZFS.