Orchard vs ABP Architecture comparison (aspnetboilerplate)

Foreword: ABP framework often in some. NET group to listen to the group of Friends mentioned, has also visited the official website, a general understanding of it is a framework, until today I officially download the source of the introduction ...

After two hours of introduction to ABP Chinese documentation (thanks to the hard translators), it is generally understood that the ABP framework provides some features like orchard, such as logging, multi-tenancy, event bus, multi-lingual, etc.

Since I have just contacted the ABP framework, here are some of my basic understandings of it, please correct me.

	Abp	Orchard	Role
Project positioning	Development framework	Content Management System (CMS) + Development Framework
Basic framework	Aspnetboilerplate (source code)	Orchard.framework	Neither can run independently, providing a framework infrastructure
Core implementations	Module-zero (source code), pure library, no UI implementation section, cannot run independently	Orchard.core (the core module collection, each folder inside is a module), There is a UI implementation.	ABP provides common basic functionality, ABP has users, roles, multitenancy, configuration management, Orchard has CMS-related core modules
Module generation	Module-zero-template (source code), available online version.	Orchard.codegeneration (command line)	ABP website provides an online module creation function (address), this generator has two versions: 1. Rely on core ABP only 2. reliance on Module-zero. The ABP does not provide input meta information when creating the module, and Orchard can.

All along, a lot. NET developers are very fond of orchard this project, but some neat-looking developers are always trying to peel it off into a clean frame, such as Orchardnocms,

Now the ABP may be your best choice:

1. ABP has a very similar orchard project structure (I even think the ABP is inspired by orchard).

2. Functionally also provides the same features as orchard, such as multi-tenancy, module, log, user, role, authorization and so on.

3. ABP does not come with any additional business code, and the core functions of users and roles are also implemented in the zero module, if you do not like it can be used.

Using the ABP framework for two development, if you do not focus on the framework itself, use the online address generation module to download it locally, and then use NuGet to download Abp.dll and Abp.zero.dll (optional) and other three-party dependencies to develop the Web application directly.

The ABP Framework provides a paid backend management implementation for enterprise users: Aspnetzero (address, $699,$1699,$2799 three license), using this value-added module, You can have a bootstrap-based background management UI to manage basic information such as multi-tenancy and user roles, but you can also use it to develop other features.

Tags: orchard,abp,orchardnocms

Orchard vs ABP Architecture comparison (aspnetboilerplate)