Pay-as-you-go, micro-camera

1. Full automatic mode is available for beginners. In full automatic mode, you can take good photos without professional technology.

2. The main factor determining the image quality is the sensor size.

The sensor area of Nikon J1/V1 is 116mm,
The sensor area of Panasonic gf3 is 225mm,
Olympus has a sensor area of 225mm square meters (produced by Panasonic ),
The sensor area of Sony NEX series is 365mm,
The sensor area of the Nikon body is also ten thousand and three square meters (produced by Sony) at a price of less than 365mm square meters ),
The sensor area of the Canon body is ten thousand and three square meters at a price of less than 332mm.

In addition, the sensor area of the mainstream card machine (1/2. 3) is 2mm (do not trust the quality of the consumer card machine to be comparable to that of the micro-single, single-electric, and single-SLR ).

Obviously, there is no essential difference between the quality of most of Sony's micro-single and Nikon Canon's slrs. nex5n and nex7 are a little bit better than most low-end slrs. In general, they are still of a grade.

Panasonic/Olympus is the second, while Nikon's micro-picture quality is worse (the worst picture quality micro-picture is Pentax Q ).

3. the operation of microservices is generally relatively simple, and more digital filters are available in general, and video shooting is powerful.

4. pay for the goods,:

A big-name camera will be a little more expensive. If Nikon is the same as Samsung's camera, the price will be the same. You are sure to buy a Nikon camera, or not. Therefore, it is a dumb to keep Nikon from selling it.

In addition, the latest models have a large amount of moisture, while those that have been listed for a while are relatively less moisture.
==============================
Well, I have already mentioned this. I recommend two models directly,

Sony NEX-C3, reason: 1, shape small and beautiful; 2, price stability; 3, good picture quality, slightly better than nex5n with nex7, but the latter two prices are expensive, in addition, the 5N has an abnormal door ".

Olympus E-PL2, reason: 1, shape retro fan, lens volume is also small; 2, affordable; 3, picture quality than Panasonic GF2, GF3 better, better than Nikon Pentax micro single; 4, anti-shake body; 5, Focus fast.

Question

Thank you for your answers ~~ Nikon, I have completely abandoned ...... I have some questions about Panasonic and Sony ......
I 'd like to ask another question. The sensor is very important. Are there any ideas about the lens?
GF3's most attractive cookies are really portable ~~

Answer

Sensors are the most important factor in determining image quality,
In contrast, the effect of the lens quality is slightly smaller,
Each family has a cookie header, which is basically just a penny,
Panasonic's 20mm f1.7 (equivalent to 40mm) is the most expensive, and naturally the best imaging, but there is a limit on the bottom.
Panasonic also has a 14mm f2.5 (equivalent to 28mm) biscuit head, imaging is more general,
Olympus also has a 17mm f2.8 (equivalent to 34mm) biscuit head imaging (Olympus and Panasonic lenses can basically use each other ),
Sony currently only has a 16mm f2.8 (equivalent to 24mm) biscuit head, imaging is also average, but the cheapest price, the largest angle of view.

If there is no money, Olympus EP3 with Panasonic 20mm f1.7 is a good choice, almost from the legendary humanistic perspective.

One thing to note is that it is not recommended for new users to use fixed-focus lenses. The zoom head is the best choice for new users. Well, Panasonic also has a zoom biscuit head coming soon, which seems to be very poor in imaging. The fish and the bear's paw cannot have both sides.