The most interesting profession in the world is website designers. Some people charge 5000 US dollars for their work, while others only pay 129 US dollars. Many people cannot see the difference between the two, I have met a Canadian Freelancer designer who has a quote system on his website. You can select your budget range. The smallest option is-US dollars, and on Craigslist (www.craigslist.org, hundreds of dollars of website designers are everywhere. If you read Alistapart (www.alistapart.com), you will know what top designers are thinking all day long. They are just a matter of things. For some subtle things, there are many people in the world who are pursuing perfection, perfection does not exist, so everyone is doing it at random. A website is such a product, and its consumers think it is unattainable. In the eyes of designers, its threshold is so low that it is so difficult for a really good work. There are 1.3 million websites in China. They either have never been updated, contain a large number of technical errors, or cannot be accessed in the second browser, or are completely abandoned by search engines, either it's terrible, or it's hard to understand, or it's just a single attack, or it's over-designed like a pop-up, or it's just as simple as a straw team.
The 101 indicators of perfect enterprise websites were born in this way. Around 1999, I started my career as an IT consulting consultant for enterprises, mainly for enterprise Web applications and development, I have successively participated in the development of COMSHARP E2RP and comsharp cms (www.comsharp.com). The latter is a website content management system, and I think this post is an advertisement post. I can choose to leave here when I read it, many people still remember the time in late 1990s and early 2000 when Netscape was not dead and Firefox was not yet born, but Opera was already quietly alive because it was too low-key, people did not even think of the browser version when they used Javascr platinum pt. In that era, it was very popular to output different HTML code for different browsers. Microsoft's DHTML was very exciting. It was cool to launch the Javascr transform pt special effect on the website, and Java Applet was cool. In short, in the period when the Web bubble was still rich, people dressed up as the girl in the country of HTML, and new technologies emerged one after another. Every new technology was used by everyone.
I have been engaged in the development of these two products. Until 2007, I have been engaged in Web usability, security, W3C standards and SEO Research. This accumulation is the basis of 101 indicators, as mentioned above, perfection does not exist, so I do not guarantee that these 101 indicators are perfect and the standards are changing at any time. In this sense, perfect enterprise websites are just one goal. 101 indicators are mandatory and guiding indicators. Mandatory indicators are generally applicable to ease of use, security, W3C standards, SEO, etc, the guiding indicators are for content and design. The 101 metric items of the perfect enterprise website are now in the second version. I will adjust the entries to release the updated version at any time.
We have a set of strict standards, including 101 indicators, to evaluate the perfection of corporate websites. comsharp cms is built on this standard. These 101 indicators are divided into seven categories:
- Content
- Easy to use
- Design
- Security
- Performance
- W3C standard
- SEO
We put the content first, and put the design that many enterprises put too much emphasis on in the third place. In fact, in a corporate website, the content represents 80% of the value of the entire site, this is something that comsharp cms repeatedly emphasizes. If we use the above seven aspects for people, we may wish to understand a perfect person like this:
- Content (I really want to learn)
- Easy to use (easy to communicate and get along)
- Design (looks great)
- Secure (very reliable)
- Performance (healthy and strong)
- W3C standard (compliant with rules)
- SEO (followed by many people)