CPU Performance Comparison of each model of the notebook:
T20x0 Series |
T2x50 Series |
T2x00 Series |
Low-voltage core Edition |
T5x00 Series |
Low-voltage edition Core 2 * |
T7x00 Series |
|
|
|
|
|
|
T7700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
T7600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
T7500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
T7400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
T7300 |
|
|
T2700 |
|
|
|
T7200 |
|
|
T2600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
T2500 |
|
T5600 |
L5600 |
T7100 |
|
T2450 |
|
|
T5300 |
L7500 |
|
|
T2350 |
T2400 |
L2500 |
T5500 |
L7400 |
T5470 |
T2130 |
T2250 |
T2300 |
L2400 |
T5200 |
L7300 |
|
T2080 |
T2050 |
|
|
|
L7200 |
T5250 |
T2060 |
|
|
L2300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U7500 |
|
|
|
|
U2500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U2400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U2300 |
|
|
|
Note: from top to bottom, the CPU performance is increased from high to low, that is, the t7700 has the highest performance, and the u2300 has the lowest performance. The performance of the CPU type in the same row is not much different. (The functions are not considered)
PS: I always thought that the higher the model, the better the performance. It seems that this is not the case. In the past, I didn't believe that the t2700 would be similar to the t7200 performance. I didn't expect it to be similar.
Intel full-line "cost-effective" processor comparison table
Model |
Core |
Clock speed |
FSB |
L2cache |
64-bit support |
Interface |
Core Duo t2050 |
Yonah |
1.6 GHz |
533 MHz |
2 MB |
N |
Socket m |
Core Duo t2250 |
Yonah |
1.73 GHz |
533 MHz |
2 MB |
N |
Socket m |
Core Duo t2350 |
Yonah |
1.86 GHz |
533 MHz |
2 MB |
N |
Socket m |
Core Duo t2450 |
Yonah |
2.0 GHz |
533 MHz |
2 MB |
N |
Socket m |
Pentium duo t2060 |
Yonah |
1.6 GHz |
533 MHz |
1 MB |
N |
Socket m |
Pentium duo t2080 |
Yonah |
1.73 GHz |
533 MHz |
1 MB |
N |
Socket m |
Pentium duo t2130 |
Yonah |
1.86 GHz |
533 MHz |
1 MB |
N |
Socket m |
Core 2 Duo t5200 |
Merom |
1.6 GHz |
533 MHz |
2 MB |
Y |
Socket m |
Core 2 Duo t5300 |
Merom |
1.73 GHz |
533 MHz |
2 MB |
Y |
Socket m |
Core 2 Duo t5250 |
Merom |
1.5 GHz |
667 MHz |
2 MB |
Y |
Socket P |
Core 2 Duo t5450 |
Merom |
1.66 GHz |
667 MHz |
2 MB |
Y |
Socket P |
Pentium duo t2310 |
Merom |
1.46 GHz |
533 MHz |
1 MB |
Y |
Socket P |
Pentium duo t2330 |
Merom |
1.6 GHz |
533 MHz |
1 MB |
Y |
Socket P |
CPU parameters for each model of the notebook
Processor Series |
Dual-core |
Cache |
Front-End bus |
Energy-saving Frequency Conversion |
64-bit |
Mobile Platform |
Core 2t7x00 odd |
Yes |
4 m |
800 |
Yes |
Yes |
Cij4 |
Even number of core 2t7x00 |
Yes |
4 m |
667 |
Yes |
Yes |
Json3 |
Odd Number of core 2t7x00 low-voltage Edition |
Yes |
4 m |
800 |
Yes |
Yes |
Cij4 |
Even number of core 2t7x00 low-voltage Edition |
Yes |
4 m |
667 |
Yes |
Yes |
Json3 |
Core 2t5x50 Series |
Yes |
2 m |
667 |
Yes |
Yes |
Cij4 |
Core 2t5cross Series |
Yes |
2 m |
800 |
Yes |
Yes |
Cij4 |
Core 2u7x00: lower pressure |
Yes |
4 m |
667 |
Yes |
Yes |
Cij4 |
Cool 2t5x00 (667) |
Yes |
2 m |
667 |
Yes |
Yes |
Json3 |
Core 2l5x00 low-voltage Edition |
Yes |
2 m |
667 |
Yes |
Yes |
Json3 |
Core 2t5x00 (533) |
Yes |
2 m |
667 |
Yes |
Yes |
Json3 |
Core t2x00 Series |
Yes |
2 m |
667 |
Yes |
No |
Json3 |
Core l2x00 low-voltage Edition |
Yes |
2 m |
667 |
Yes |
No |
Json3 |
Core u2x00 ultra-low Edition |
Yes |
2 m |
533 |
Yes |
No |
Json3 |
Core u1x00 ultra-low Edition |
No |
2 m |
533 |
Yes |
No |
Json3 |
Core t1x00 Series |
No |
2 m |
667 |
Yes |
No |
Json3 |
Core t1x50 Series |
No |
2 m |
533 |
Yes |
No |
Json3 |
Core t2x50 Series |
Yes |
2 m |
533 |
Yes |
No |
Json3 |
Core t1x50 Series |
No |
2 m |
533 |
Yes |
No |
Json3 |
Pentium dual-core t2xx0 Series |
Yes |
1 m |
533 |
Yes |
No |
Non-Gender |
Sai Yang m5x0 Series |
No |
1 m |
533 |
No |
No |
Non-Gender |
Sai Yang m4x0 Series |
No |
1 m |
533 |
No |
No |
Non-Gender |
Note: 1. Core 2 t7x00 odd (or even) indicates that X is odd (or even ).
2. The core 2 t7100 Level 2 cache is 2 m, and the other T7 series Level 2 cache is 4 m.
Performance Comparison of graphics cards of different models in the notebook
NVIDIA g8x Series |
ATI m6x Series |
NVIDIA g7x Series |
ATI m5x Series |
Integrated graphics card |
Go 8800 M GS |
|
Go 7950 GTX |
|
|
G0 8700 M GT |
|
|
|
|
Go 8600 M GTS |
X2600 |
Go 7800 GTX |
|
|
Go 8600 M GT |
|
Go 7900 GS |
|
|
Go 8600 M GS |
|
|
X1900 |
|
Go 8600 m gs (DDR2) |
|
Go 1, 7700 |
X1800 |
|
|
|
Go 7600 GT |
X1700/x1600 |
|
|
|
Go 1, 7600 |
X1700/x1600 (DDR2) |
|
Go 8400 m g/GS |
X2500 |
Go 7600 (reduced) |
X1600 (reduced) |
|
|
X2400 |
Go 1, 7400 |
X1400 |
|
|
X2300 |
Go 1, 7300 |
X1300 (reduced) |
|
|
|
Go 7300/go 7200 (reduced) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATI x1250m Inter GMA x3100 |
|
|
|
|
NVIDIA go6150 |
|
|
|
|
Inter gma950 |
|
|
|
|
ATI x200/1100 m |
Note: from top to bottom, the performance is from high to low. That is, go 8800 m gs and go 7950 GTX have the highest performance. ATI x200/1100m has the worst performance. The performance of the same line of graphics card is not much different.
Original post address: http://yidesu.spaces.live.com/blog/cns%218294F6C15218137B%21161.entry