"Personal supplementary question" of software engineering

(1) Where do you think this course needs to be improved, specific measures, including: time schedule, project difficulty, etc. can be;

As for the "building method" of the software engineering of the wrinkle teacher, I have no right to evaluate it, but for the textbook of a semester, I briefly describe the individual's views on the book: First of all, the theoretical knowledge of the book is too little, we students do not know how to learn, although the textbook combines a lot of stories, But when we combine the textbook with the actual, we don't know how to start. and homework a bit too much, some of the project difficult, such as the last team project, as a junior students, we take the shot is only C + +, for the use of Android, a little confused. The time schedule should be just right after a few projects are reduced, too much homework and a loss of interest for students who have just been exposed to such lessons.

(2) What do you think the TA / teacher is not doing enough to limit too much?

For this course, it may be because of the reform, the teacher in the series may be a bit insufficient, the class is not so smooth, the actual thing a little too little to cause students to understand the course is not enough, and the TA I personally think is a more serious work, although not seen the true face, The evaluation of the job is very, very serious, and the combination of graphs and data is very convincing.

(3) What do you think is the problem of the grading standard of the project, what do you think is the reasonable grading standard (individual / team / pair )?

For the teacher of this grading standard, I feel a bit too vague, many places we do not know what the teacher's standard is, where is the score point, for the completion of homework, we may be a full article of the narrative, did not reach the grading standards, which will lead to a lot of students confidence gradually missing. In the era of plagiarism, my personal scoring standards are: in advance, the teacher gave specific grading details, excellent to five points, according to the completion of the task of the students to complete the level of the task to judge their authenticity, check out the plagiarism of 0 points processing.

Team scoring criteria: according to the role of the students and the contribution to the team work to score, according to my understanding, each team is almost one or two people are doing, so according to team tasks and the level of familiarity with the task score.

Knot pair Project scoring standard: In order to prevent the workload imbalance problem, when the job published, the teacher should give the grading rules, so that students have a balance of psychology, to measure their work to pay the amount. Improve the enthusiasm of students!

(4) In the pair project do you really feel the benefits of the end of the right, whether the real strict to the programming, the other side of the workload is the same?

For this assignment, to tell the truth, I did not feel the benefits of pairing programming, but is a drag, two people's character is not the same, the idea is not the same, the love of the program is not the same, we do not seem to be the kind of motivation in the company, the basic knowledge of the two people are different, so the workload is not the

(5) If your team project is successful, do you choose this team again? Why failure ?

Self-feeling, this time we are failure, the assignment is not reasonable, because our team has four people to grind, the rest of the busy looking for work, not to get together, and for self-study Android, we use unfamiliar, for some team projects. I can say this is not the result of our work together. But the captain assigned to each individual project is not the same, plainly, these assignments and personal work are similar, or even better than personal work, we seem too concerned about their homework and do not pay attention to team work, this time our team is very poor, but not which group of the scores of the team to do well, a lot of homework is the captain to do, The players are really too few and too few.

If you can come again, I will choose this team, we self-study Android, although not very perfect, but I want to dedicate all of their own, this time I really did not do their own, did not do their own task.

(6) summarize the timing of your team's work on the project?

for this team work, perhaps the first team work, our schedule is not and reasonable, our team has a total of abcdef individuals, in the early stages of the team project, but in the demand analysis, only ABC in division of work done, rest def is not assigned to the task, and to some team projects, there is a total of the first to the seventh time, and then the top four jobs have a ppt c thought abcdef > People are finally going to get together to distribute the task explained, and finally didn't get together, so finally this team project abcdef > never got together.

(7) Do you have any other good suggestions/comments about this course ?

There is too little communication between the teacher and the student, the teacher should strengthen the classroom communication, improve the classroom atmosphere, in some individual projects, the project, after the completion of the team project, the class should be in time to share the experience and technology, appropriate encouragement, develop students interest in this course.

"Personal supplementary question" of software engineering