Personal work-"people, Performance and professional ethics"

Reading "People, performance and professional ethics", really let me benefit. At the beginning of the article, the author cites a small story about pigs, chickens and parrots, which is very interesting and naturally brings people into it, allowing readers to be interested in the article. Indeed, as the story says, in peacetime work and study, everyone around him plays a role, some are pigs, but he can devote himself to things, some of them are chickens, they just play the role of the participants, and some are parrots, although they are dressed in beautiful appearance, But in life is only the role of onlookers. But when we work together as a team, no matter what role we want to be or what role we really are, as long as each of us is doing our part, it is the greatest contribution to the team. In a team not to say how I want to do, I want to be the leader, as long as we work together to do this project, the glory is actually everyone's. It is not possible to have a team without anyone.

After reading this article, I was impressed. The importance of division of Labor, said that the division will have to mention the position of the leader, a team must choose a decision-maker, so in the face of big things will be decided, the team leader in the group played a leading role, the leader must according to each member's characteristics of the division of Labor, Only a good division of labor can ensure that the project is completed quickly and well. Division after the completion of the team members of the running-in period, everyone has a person's ideas and thoughts, so in a lot of things may be disputed, this time the leader came forward, the team leader to do a correct decision to appease each member of the mood, so that everyone can not take the mood to work. As a member of this group, I think everyone should also take control of their own small emotions, in a team, as long as everyone can be tolerant of a little, no matter the big things do not create a kind of injury and gas.

I think that there are generally object-oriented programming people, that the most difficult and most headache is the design. A good project, design can account for at least 50% or more. I think the design has two main ideas, one is high cohesion low coupling, one is the design should be behavior-centric rather than data-centric, the industry should be demand-centric. The controversy over design is long-standing, in my opinion, it is determined by the nature of the industry, after all, the software industry is for other industries to serve, so the division, as the experience of the growth of business capacity is gradually greater than the ability to program, therefore, the process of decision-making business or business decision procedure becomes a materialistic and idealistic exchange of fire Although in recent years the business decision project controversy has been drawn to the first, but's forgive forget difficult to eliminate, there are still a lot of people are determined to determine the framework of the project, and then analyze the business supporting the relevant technology ideas, this part of the people, if not the process-oriented era of development, it must be nerdy. The business decision project, the project decision framework, the framework determines the programming language, in the final analysis, the fundamental reason is that the software industry is the service sector. This is fundamental, do not confuse.

If I say that after reading this article is the reason of enlightenment, then after reading a programmer's blog, I get a spiritual inspiration. The blog programmer introduced him from graduation to work to the success of the process, from his first situation, it can be said that the starting point than we are much lower, that is the level of education may be much lower than the present, but the author has never given up the dream, he knew that in school due to the problem of time, must learn the knowledge is limited, He knew that he had to learn a little more in his spare time to be more employable than the other students. In this way he can be said to find a job after graduation, but to find a job is not suitable for himself, just beginning the author in a company can be said to be only the author of the job, the meager income can only maintain the household, but he did not abandon himself, on the contrary, he found the opportunity to let others find his value. The author of this point is very worthy of my study, now we are in a position to stay in the habit, do not want to change the total feel now that you can, and thus forget their original dream is what. I think now we should want to study this author, never forget their original dream is what, not complacent, should be aggressive, strive to do the best of their own.

Read the blog in the park inside the blog I have the following points:

1, our contemporary college students in the high school after the great pressure of destruction, thought in the university can relax, but the university is what we really should study hard place. This may have something to do with some of the ills of China's current education system, but should we think more about changing ourselves in the face of things we can't change? Some great software engineers have achieved good results, not only because they are talented, but because they devote a lot of time to delving into it.

2, software engineering is a subject that requires a lot of practice time. College should be a lot of code, exercise hands-on ability. Some of our current undergraduate students, just listen to the class, followed by the teacher, the textbook Knock Code just, the class did not practice at all. This is undoubtedly a bad learning software.

3. Be able to keep a good quality of knowledge. In today's complex academic circles, it is undoubtedly very valuable to keep a childlike heart and strive to be a true, upright and excellent technician. In view of some of our contemporary college students, learning business people want to make big money, learning managers want to be bigger officials, do senior executives, all are exquisite egoism, lack of that revolutionary lofty sentiments and serve the people, for the motherland's lofty feelings of devotion.

Personal work-"people, Performance and professional ethics"