Postgraduate review plan and time management

As we all know, the postgraduate entrance exam is a systematic and massive project that needs to be fully grasped. In this year or half a year, how do I organize my own review plan? How can I effectively manage my review time? How can we greatly improve learning efficiency through scientific review planning and time management? These are undoubtedly the most important questions for the majority of candidates. In this section, we will give you a long-awaited answer.
I. Why should I make a review plan?
1. Plan the characteristics of the Postgraduate Entrance Exam
The postgraduate entrance exam is generally longer than the usual final exam. As the highest-level entrance exam in China, it has to go through the basic knowledge reserve, question type enhancement and integration, simulated reinforcement and sprint several rounds of review. In addition, the postgraduate entrance exams only take four courses. In fact, there are much more content to be examined, which involves complicated problems such as the relationship between courses and courses, and the relationship between subjects and subjects. The long history and wide-ranging content make the postgraduate entrance exam itself a complicated system. Without a clear plan, it is often a waste of time to review and reduce the review effect. A good review plan can eliminate the psychological uncertainty of candidates, so that they can feel safe and will not be confused. You must know that many things are not a problem, but chaos is a problem.
2. the examinee's review features need to be planned
Due to the educational system, most Chinese students lack initiative and are used to being guided and lack independent planning. The postgraduate review is different from the College Entrance Examination review. There are no fixed classrooms, no unified teachers, no examinations of large and small sizes, the review process, the time allocation between subjects, and the check of the review effect, you must be sure of this. Obviously, most of the candidates do not have any experience in the postgraduate entrance exam before review. In this way, we need to make our review most effective for the final exam and achieve our goal smoothly, we can't just follow our feelings, but have to plan our own review.
3. Plan the importance and risks of postgraduate entrance exams
Through postgraduate entrance exams, you can gain more development space. Postgraduate Entrance Exams are also an important way for many people to change their fate. For anyone who chooses postgraduate entrance exams, Postgraduate Entrance Exams are a major life decision. Some people say that life is very long, but the key is only a few steps. The postgraduate entrance exam is one of the key steps, and the difference may be two kinds of fate. There is no doubt about the importance and risk of postgraduate entrance exams. The biggest price is not money but youth. Its biggest benefit is not diploma but quality. Therefore, after all, the postgraduate entrance exam is in a cruel struggle with fate. Only by knowing ourselves and ourselves can we win. The correct plan can achieve this and maximize our resources, let us go into the battlefield in an orderly and confident manner to make our choice.
From the above analysis, we know the necessity of the review plan for the postgraduate review preparation. What kind of review plan is a good review plan? Or in other words, what are the characteristics of a good review plan? This has guiding significance for us to develop and test our own plans. We will discuss this issue below.
Ii. Features of a good review plan
1. close connection with the actual situation
Many candidates make a plan without any limitations. The distance between the plan and the actual situation is too large. No matter how basic they are, or whether time permits or not, they simply start from their own ideals and work out the plan as a result, luxurious and beautiful, but not feasible. Our review plan is a battle map of the entire review process. It aims to give us a clear and clear understanding of our preparations and separate the overall objectives, in normal life. Therefore, a good review plan should start from the actual situation, clarify its own basis, understand its execution efficiency and mental state, and dissect its own time flow, formulate emergency allocation plans and so on, and organically break down the overall goal for allocation, instead of simply cutting it apart and mechanically spreading it to ordinary times.
2. Clear and easy to record and view
Good planning should be clear and clear, so that we can execute and monitor ourselves. First of all, I would like to point out that many students only think about it in their minds and write it on paper very little or even no. This is not good, as the saying goes: Good memory is not as bad as writing. We may have forgotten our hard-working plan after a sleep. We need to know what we are going to do recently and consider from the very beginning. This will not only waste time, it also made a great discount for the execution of the plan. Although such a plan is very "flexible", it lacks a macro grasp of the overall review process, and the final review process will inevitably lead to faults or delays. Therefore, the plan made by everyone must be put on paper. It is not required to be too long, but it must be clear and clear. In this way, we can move forward steadily according to the plan every day, which is of great significance for the implementation of the plan and the achievement of the final goal.
3. Flexible and operable
In addition to the two points mentioned above, a good review plan must also have the characteristics of "external vertices. The so-called "external circle" refers to the combination of the flexibility and operability of planning. On the one hand, the planning should be completed in a quality and quantity manner, and on the other hand, the emergency response strategies and backup measures should be formulated. Some people argue that they will never keep up with the changes if they do not make a plan. They are often talking about it. This is due to lack of understanding about this feature. They may fill up their daily time or even before and after meals, or are insufficient in formulating emergency response strategies, during the execution, the plan was difficult to continue when there were a little different situations than expected, so that they could not continue to execute the plan, so that they could feel frustrated and eventually give up the plan. Therefore, we should emphasize that candidates must leave room for themselves to prepare alternative solutions for emergencies when making plans, in the implementation process of the plan, adjust according to appropriate principles to ensure the effective implementation of your mentality and plan.