Programming cultivation [recommended]

What are good programmers? Do you understand many technical details? Still understand underlying programming? Or is programming faster? I don't think so. For some technical details and the underlying technologies, you only need to look at the help and query the information to find them. For the fast speed, as long as the compilation is much more practical.

I think good programmers should have the following qualities:

1. Dedicated research, diligence, and best practices.
2. Positive attitude and creative thinking.
3. Ability to actively communicate with people and team spirit.
4. Be modest and cautious, and guard against arrogance and dryness.
5. The quality of written code is high. Including: Code stability, easy to read, specification, easy to maintain, professional.

These are the accomplishments of programmers. Here I want to talk about "programming accomplishments", that is, the 5th point above. I think if I want to know an author, I will read his novels. If I want to know a painter, I will read the pictures he draws. If I want to know a worker, I will look at the products he has made. Similarly, if I want to know a programmer, what I want to see first is his program code, the program code shows the quality and accomplishment of a programmer. The program is like a work. The work of a qualified and self-developed programmer must be a beautiful picture and a wonderful song, A fascinating novel.

I have seen many programs, without comments, without indentation, without naming variable names, and so on. I refer to such people as self-developed programs, such programmers, are you doing creative work? No, it is completely destructive. They are not so much programming as "encrypting" the source program. This programmer should be fired if he sees one, because the value created by his program is far less than the value that needs to be maintained above.

Programmers should have the cultivation of programmers, so they are afraid of being tired and have no time to take responsibility for their own programs. I 'd rather ask programmers who are slow and technically average, but have a good programming style, and do not want programmers who are technically strong and fast-performing "destructive. I want to see the advantages and disadvantages of a programmer from the program. Because the program is a programmer's work, the quality of the work is directly related to the programmer's reputation and quality. The "self-developed" programmers will be able to make good programs and software.

There is an idiom called "originality", which means that everything must be done professionally and with great care. If you want to be a "craftsman", that is, a person with profound accomplishments, then, from a very simple piece of work, you can see whether you have the "craftsman" feature. I think it is not difficult to be a programmer, but it is not easy to be a "programmer. Programming is very simple, but it is difficult to compile quality programs.

I will not discuss deep technologies here. I just want to talk about some things that are easy to ignore. Although these things may be subtle, if you don't pay attention to these nuances, then, it will greatly affect your entire software quality and the implementation of the entire software process. The so-called "Leap of a thousand miles, destroyed by the ant nest ". "The nuances are true." It truly shows that the skills of a program are precisely in these nuances.

This is the programmer's experience in programming. I have summarized the "accomplishments" in program writing in the C/C ++ language (mainly the C language). Through these, you can write high-quality programs, at the same time, it will also let people who look at your program be praised, those who have read your program will certainly say: "This person's programming is good ".