"False Learning" & "true learning"? Pick

What is called "false learning"?

First, reading

Buy a bunch of books and have a look. Reading, this is a typical fake study. Read a book do not understand still watching, is false learning, deceive themselves, comfort oneself is learning just. Professional books are well written, but most of them are for people who already know. The biggest function of reading is to prove that you are not learning to read, and then only to find other ways.

Suggestion: Close the book, think about it, you want to learn what things are what to use, to grasp to what extent enough. Really not, quick to read, also better than slowly grind to read, when you think when to see, you can read to see again, or that sentence, not to look at the timing is right.

Second, lectures

Listen and take notes. Very common false learning, listening to listen to do not understand, to listen to do, is it for the lectures and lectures. The real lesson is to find questions, to express questions, to express understanding, not to listen. Other people talk about the content is very detailed, and are right, can be said to be the essence of experience, but others cannot replace your brain's operation process, can not replace your brain logic formation process, listen to learn more slowly, IP address how to match is not clear, listening to the content of OSPF useful? The biggest role of lectures is to prove that lectures are not learning anything, and then look for other ways.

Suggestion: Probably can say that, if you do not have enough questions before the lecture, to listen to the basic meaningless, first frame out, say the person can give you summed up, the role of coaching, deepen understanding. At least to the content of the lectures to start their own operation 1-2 Times.

Third, the experiment

Simple knocking experiment, and typing is no different, operation manual can tell us the results and mechanism, knock 1 times just practice the command input, only 2nd times, will have some thinking. The most important role of knocking on the experiment is to prove that the knock is over or do not understand, so must look for other ways. Recommendation: Do not look at the Operation guide, can summarize all the configuration steps and debugging steps. And can be designed to expand the experimental debugging content.

Four, look at the stickers

Each post may be a lot of time to study the experience, write better, only look at the words, also not written by themselves. See stickers do not reply, only know the top, are false learning. Suggestion: Only oneself writes the paste, cannot write out, only then discovers the thought is not rigorous, the writing is not good, only then will discover the understanding insufficiently thorough. See stickers to send their own ideas, participate in the discussion.

What is "true learning"?

First, attack

First ask you a question, you understand what, "do not understand anything", good, you understand how to write IP address? OK, write it out, ask "Why Use IP address?". Even if you know nothing, know what is really to understand.

Second, thinking

After receiving a message, how to unpack? Send a message, how to encapsulate it? It's no use remembering a bunch of concepts, you have to transform the information of the numbers into abstract information stored in the brain, and the logic and the system are synchronized and constantly trained to think.

Third, forget

Really learned, you can begin to forget, any problem, you can not understand. Experts answer questions, often say: "This problem I have not met, this question I am not clear, this question I do not understand." "But in the latter half of the sentence, experts never say," As long as I want to understand and solve, it takes only 5-10 minutes to find the answer. "The brains of experts only save ideas and methods, not details, can quickly solve any problem, ask questions, only remember a lot of specific solutions, beyond this range will not."

Learn a thing, divided into 2 steps, 1, learn to understand 2, forget. True forgetfulness is not due to the decline of memory, but rather to the fact that the problem itself has been completely shattered in the invisible.

Iv. expression

I think that learning is not the real learning, the real learning, lies in being able to speak out, so that a beginner can also listen to understand, can be considered to be learned, will not express, never learn. Understand, but do not give examples, how can be called understand it?

"False Learning" & "true learning"? Pick