"Rob train Ticket" and program ape thinking Alpha

/*
Well, this article refers to the "Rob train ticket" refers to our specific behavior of a certain day, and not refers to the phenomenon of the train ticket robbery.
*/


Do not know when it started, the villagers in the group began to organize such a wave of beiligong people return to the army to rob tickets, after various toss ...


Only one group of robberies succeeded (altogether 5 groups. ), there is also a group because the first brush successful candidate is a hard seat, so that other people can not engage in qaq


followed by a variety of complaints, envy, loss ...


Then think, it seems that I had a few times and classmates rob the success rate is not so low ah ... Every time two people must have a can brush to ...
But also can understand, in 75 when there are a lot of people on the whole process of ticket, 12306 website structure, and ticketing system of the logical relationship do not know, can not be in the shortest time to brush to the ticket is very normal ... So why is this problem happening? Because too many people brush at the same time, and then too much hope that others. Or because 12306 of the site structure is too complex.


Although the previous 12306 sites did so bad, but we still successfully robbed the train ticket. But in my opinion, now the new version of the 12306 has been done very well, do not have to make a fool mode, after all set up, the entire page only a button, as long as the kept location it is OK.


When we develop a product or design a function, we tend to think that this thing is so simple, so ingenious, the people who use him will feel that the design is very clever, very useful, but in fact.
In the use of a software or a website, we always try to understand its design logic, as well as every function, so even the formerly infamous 12306 we can easily use.


We always behave in the same way, because in the binary world, such rules are not violated, 0 and 12 are the exact opposite values. In real life, we also try to find the laws and logical relationships of various things, and then want to understand them thoroughly and propose solutions. For what we already know or understand, we tend to think that other people understand it or can easily understand it.


I also work in the community, many of the problems I have encountered may not be known to others, but I tend to think that other people know this thing even know how to solve the problem. When I was in the junior class, I always tried to explain the whole set of system logic, because I felt that only after I understood the entire set of logic could I understand a lot of the sub-problems, in fact a lot of people still couldn't understand what I was going to say, but I thought they knew. Maybe it's because my ability to express is not in place qaq ...


Maybe this article is the same, I think the reader can understand what I want to express, but ...


This is what the program ape lacks.