Re-reading the fifth chapter of the Road to Jane

I remember knowing the picture of the swing before I chose the soft worker. Or was Mr. Wang speaking at the introductory course on information. It was also a joke, a good swing, just a programmer made a tire. It was a great difference to put this picture in support of what the customer described and what the programmer made out of the product. Now see this picture, in the mind a little more feelings. In the first experiment report of the big homework of UML, oneself think very plump, but the thing that writes out is very thin. At that time I was in accordance with a teacher gave an example to imitate, look at the teacher's example of perfection, but my own project is a mess, no very rigorous thinking and structure, in the constant modification has and I think some obvious deviation. Do not have to do with their own thinking is exactly the same, not to mention the requirements of customers, especially the customer's expression and the way the programmer's thinking has a distinct time, in addition, the customer to do the project content, programmers are not familiar with, and maybe even the programmer has not been involved in the field.

However, the road to Jane here is not very clear about this problem, but also a bit of this meaning. The emphasis here is to follow the steps, but there is still a gap between the product and the expectations. Personally, I think this is similar to what I said before. The root of the problem comes from doing the project for the sake of the process.

Here's a very common example of a meeting or a game to watch. Since the freshman year, the school has repeatedly asked the class or dormitory for the meeting or to watch the game. It was supposed to be an interest to take part in this kind of thing, but it turned out to be a scene and a formality.

Everybody doesn't like the motions, because it's meaningless.

Compared to the scene, to do the project, or should be achieved for the purpose.

Give a personal example to illustrate the importance of the purpose.

People who have been through the senior three have a fact--the homework is super, even the mountains (sometimes a classmate can see the papers and books full of desks when they come back from a day of absence). Nevertheless, my homework, basically are their own completion, hitting the electricity in the dormitory Midnight oil, do not want to copy other people's answers to deceive the teacher, do not want to get a correct answer to their own more face. Would rather not hand in the homework to be named criticism also to write good practice well. At that time, with a copy of the mind, I must personally to feel each problem, not in their own panic on the examination room, regrets for life under the examination room. At that time, I really was in the struggle for the college entrance exam, in order to do things for that goal. Now, the University of Life, more freedom, although there are courses and late self-study and running arrangements, but, there is a good saying, as long as the courage, seven days a week is false. In the face of the complexity of the work is done to complete, and the school arrangements we for the various reports to do the audience is the same way. There is no point. So that we all lost the once the vision and hope for the university.

Finally, to return to the project, the project needs to be driven by purpose, but also by the organization.

No matter whether the project is vast, the need for teamwork, Unison, to the project to do a good job.

Re-reading the fifth chapter of the Road to Jane