Reflection of the site snapshot back

Some time ago the hands of a carving machine site died 10 fishes chain, leading to the ranking of keywords all hung, while the snapshot back file. It's a pain in the egg to talk about it. Of course, today is not to spit this incident, mainly through this snapshot back to file things let me think of a previous saw Baidu about the site snapshot of the announcement, Baidu means that Baidu snapshot update is based on "the site has important content updates" to judge.

The original text reads as follows:

Each new crawl or newly checked Web page, we will be based on its importance and timeliness of the value of a different speed to create the index, usually referred to as the snapshot update time refers to the index time, some often have important content updated pages, we will be faster to create the index.

(See Baidu Webmaster Platform: HTTP://ZHANZHANG.BAIDU.COM/WIKI/54)

That's a really nice look. The update of the site snapshot should be such a process: The site has been updated → Baidu Spider climbed → Baidu spider think that the update is important → create a new index → snapshot update. If this logic is true, then the snap-back thing is going to have to be thought about. But now the reason for this site snapshot back is obviously should be hanging off some external links rather than content, to know how this site was originally a right to drop the site, not long ago just with the original method to save back, the content on the site will not be poor to where. From October 7 to find a snapshot of the site back to now write this article when--October 17, there are at least 10 days, the site has one to two of the original update every day, the individual to ensure that the quality of the update is absolutely no problem, and Baidu's collection of continuous growth of the liquid illustrates this, but the snapshot is still not updated, This time we wonder what is the situation?

The first guess: the site lost important outside the chain, resulting in the site back into the audit period. However, this does not explain the reason for the snapshot back. External chain impact snapshots are not updated this is not the case before the site has encountered similar, but the snapshot is basically five or six days time again updated, not as serious as this site now, a full 10 days of time.

The second speculation: in fact, the Web site snapshot back to the content of the site has no relationship, or the relationship is not very small, but with the site is "wrong" related. Now this site is generally the case, the site made a mistake, was Baidu shut into the small black House "through labor", Baidu website "image" back to a previous "good image" on, then the following plot is not like this: the site in the small black house during the "labor" performance good, to obtain the recognition of Baidu, Baidu has been sent back to the site a "Good Man card", while the site snapshots also follow the update.

But whether it's the first speculation or the second one, or both, do a good job of Web site content This means is the use of the Sihai, if it is the site into the audit period, so do a good job of the content, and then do a few of the links to the spider, should be able to leave the review period, if it is closed into the small black House, the site was Snapshot back, then remove some adverse effects, and then still have to do a good job of content, and then do some high-quality outside the chain, the weight of the site to do back again.

Well, said so much, in fact, mainly to guess Baidu this snapshot back to file the principle, incidentally spit slot Baidu so-called "site snapshot back to the site with no link to the right K station" argument, whether you believe it or not, anyway, I do not believe.

Jinan Quality pulse engraving machine: http://www.jnpmcnc.com/plus/list.php?tid=3