Regarding Sina's blog post "Clean up spam and haze in philosophy-comment on Mr Chen dingxue's article on four major defects of <Contradiction Theory>.
Thanks to Mr Yuan's wonderful comment, because the text is a little long (compared with the 140 words limited by Sina, cutting is too troublesome ), the comments and replies of the bloggers are listed as follows:
Yuanyuan Mr.'s brilliant comments:
The author of the "Two theories" is not comfortable with the "Contradiction Theory" and has said that the practice theory is better. Therefore, it is normal to have different or supplementary opinions, which is conducive to the integrity of the theory. From the perspective of historical practices, the "main contradictions" or "main aspects of contradictions" can be determined manually and in advance, or are they finally proven and objective by history, we have profound lessons and may not have completely solved them so far. The meaning of further discussion is here.
Reply from the blogger himself:
Sir! Chairman Mao himself is not comfortable with the theory of contradictions, but what is the theory of contradictions. However, as Mr. Cheng said, it is normal to have different or supplementary opinions. Even if it is helpful to misinterpret, make a fuss, and slander, even if you do not know [intentionally or unintentionally] What you have commented on, the facts are normal and you don't have to make a fuss. The world is so big that it is no wonder whether it is sincere or not, whether it is theoretical or unreasonable, and so on. Mr. Qian Zhongshu is not comfortable with some of the things he has written. Apart from the normal academic discussion, it is rare that we will be able to criticize and advertise ourselves. Of course, even if Mr. Qian Zhongshu is there, I am afraid he will not be surprised. Believe it or not, you can refer to a reprinted copy of this article he wrote.
Mr. Whether it is "main contradiction" or "covering up main contradictions", whether it is "main contradiction aspect" or "main contradiction aspect", whether it is a two-point theory in reality or its relativity and condition, and so on. Even the truth is so uncertain. At the same time, it is such a certainty that only such determination can effectively prevent teaching and rigidity, and draw a better line between the two.
Yan Wen mainly talks about Chen Wen from Engels's anti-dulin theory, not from the Contradiction Theory, in essence, Chen Wen is [subjective or objective] directly targeting the Contradiction Theory of Engels [Far Away] without directly discussing the article of Engels, of course, no matter what the discussion is, it is "normal", just as it is normal for Engels to thoroughly criticize the metaphysical materialism Mr. Du Lin. I just copied something from Engels: mr. Chen spent more than 50 years in his "theory of contradictions" and found that the "Chen" contradiction theory is based on the "defects" of the treasure. It is just one hundred years ago, the metaphysical materialism du Lin. mr.'s Contradiction Theory is just a battle.
Mr seems to be a diligent thinker. It would be a great honor to see Mr Chen Wen/Contradiction Theory/conflict theory/Wen/and other articles!
20140606
Reply to comments on "cleaning up spam and haze in philosophy ..."
