Ridiculous-comment on seven reasons why Windows 7 cannot beat Ubuntu

Article Title: Ridiculous-comment on seven reasons why Windows 7 cannot beat Ubuntu. Linux is a technology channel of the IT lab in China. Includes basic categories such as desktop applications, Linux system management, kernel research, embedded systems, and open source.

7 reasons windows 7 cannot beat ubuntu (http://Linux.chinaitlab.com/info/774409.html)

1. some entrepreneurs in Ubuntu are at the helm, and no one is at the helm after Bill leaves Microsoft? As far as I know, Bill has not managed much of Microsoft's major business many years ago. it is good for major shareholders to take money, but Bill is indeed a great legend, I don't think this friend knows who the president of Microsoft is!

2. ubuntu has better server compatibility. This sentence should be replaced by Linux with better server compatibility, but in fact, the famous super computer, super server almost does not use Linux, as well as bank securities... without exception, the Unix operating system is used, that is, some slightly larger websites are basically BSD Unix systems, and general small and medium enterprise applications use Windows Server family products, because Windows client systems can provide better interoperability and simple configuration management, except for a few exceptions, only some websites that are not as good as the stream use the Linux system, and they are indeed a large number.

3. ubuntu has a loyal partner, Sorry. when I went to buy an HP notebook, I saw that all the pre-installed Windows systems were installed. HP and DELL could be unhappy with Microsoft, but they could not cooperate with Microsoft, who is willing to fight against money.

4. the netbook will continue to evolve. as the network speed increases, it may be a trend to keep computing on the server, but to use only one simple system terminal for operations. Windows 7 will be able to do this well, according to data, Windows 7 can be reduced to 80 m with GUI, and server-only can be reduced to smaller (kernel + network components + ASP.. NET ).

5. ubuntu applications will increase, and there will not be more than Windows applications, especially some of the most popular software-games, linux's micro-kernel architecture cannot be compared with NT's hybrid micro-kernel architecture. the pure user-mode GUI components make the graphic-intensive software run at a low efficiency, if you do not feel slow, thank you for your hardware, rather than how fast the Linux system is, because the nt gui subsystem is in the core state, step 4: draw a straight line on the screen. NT is faster than Linux (this does not include OpenGL)

6. windows is losing the mobile phone market. this is not completely correct. it can only be said that the current share of Linux in the mobile phone market is higher than that of Windows. when the processing capability reaches a certain level, mobile app apps based on SmartPhone or Packet PC will be more full, from the programmer's point of view, because many APIs are relatively easy to shift value. In the past, mobile phones were slower than chips, and the memory was small. Therefore, you can run some simple things in Linux. it is hard to say that the market share of SmartPhone will not surpass that of Linux in the future.

7. the establishment of the open source model, I do not know whether open source and software fail to become any inevitable relationship, it seems that the open source Windows system is still successful, there are more software. From a certain point of view, it is a good thing for developers to use the Well-Defined interface to develop software without reading so much code. it isolates many things to consider when moving values, in the same architecture, the drivers of the NT system even have binary compatibility because of the interfaces, some drivers that comply with the WDM specifications can have binary compatibility in 98 and NT5 completely different systems. Of course, for some people who like to Diy a small kernel, Linux is definitely the first choice. for some software development that may affect the stability of Windows systems, Microsoft is very open-minded, provide source code and detailed documentation, including technical support. if you sign an agreement, you can still see the Windows source code. I think all major anti-virus software companies have the Windows source code, the WRK code is basically open to the public, and the WDK documentation is so rich.

In general, I think Ubuntu cannot be defeated by Windows 7 because it is not comparable to anything of magnitude. I am very disgusted with those who exaggerate the Linux desktop system because the Linux desktop system is so immature. I borrowed the style of mj0011, saying, "the Linux desktop system is so vulgar, if the parents of people who use these systems know that their children are using these systems, they will even die with shame... ", In the end, this sentence is purely inappropriate for Linuxer users. I am still the one who calls mj to use downstream software. Let's criticize Windows when you know about the Windows system and the Windows kernel.