Rising left me speechless!

That night, the article "The purpose of the 2010 Public Beta of Rising Star has completely knocked down even Thunder" was reported. On the next day, rising personnel contacted me to discuss the article and asked me to remove the blog post.

 

Because this person does not want his words to appear on the media network, he only posts the reply at the time:

 

Actually, this is not because of this prize.
Rising's positioning for the purpose of the test is disappointing.
In the past, I always thought that rising was the most promising way to kill software in China.
If the purpose of rising public beta is different from what I wrote in blog posts, it would be the best thing.
People are not afraid of shadows. Time will prove everything for rising

 

After being rejected, the employee said that the contact discussion was related to his personal behavior and had nothing to do with rising.

 

 

Later, the staff of the rising Media Forum sent a new message.

 

He received the message that day:

 

Rising Public Beta activities mainly aim to promote
Therefore, in the evaluation post, try to write highlights as much as possible.
Therefore, none of our posts have won the prize if we write any defect.
Rising likes to see advantages

 

Reply:

 

 

Why don't you say it earlier, so I don't have to spend time and energy doing tests.

 

 

He replied:

 

Boss, their evaluation criteria are like this, and I am the last to know.
The competition was awarded by rising engineers.

 

 

Even the media partners are confused. Rising makes me speechless!

 

 

Rising, you and Qihoo fight and go to a lawsuit with Kabbah. This is a market operation and you have to pay it back.

 

However, if you take Rising's 2010 Public beta software as a stage to show off, the main purpose of "looking at advantages and writing highlights" is to make a good speech: innovation and innovation, to put it bluntly, it is to despise Software Engineering Science, abase the Original Meaning of "open software testing", ignore the problems existing in software products, and not take the quality of software products seriously, this is what any software developer who loves software development and regards software quality as life cannot tolerate. It is also an extremely irresponsible performance for the majority of rising users.

 

If you target the media partners involved in the Public Beta of Rising's 2010 software, the evaluation from the forum will be amateur and irrelevant, you just need to pick out the comments and test posts with all the highlights to post the rewards to yourself. This is even more wrong, because the people who participate in the evaluation of the Forum may be old users of rising, it may also become a new user of rising. This will not only make old users feel discouraged, but also scare potential new users away.

 

It has been nearly five days since the second phase of Public Beta. In the test area of the Cooperation Media Forum I participated in the first phase of the test, apart from the posts posted by the winners of the first phase, there are only a handful of second-stage evaluation posts posted by other people. On the 1st page, they are still the majority of the first-stage evaluation posts, including occasional first-stage evaluation posts, there is no popularity during the first phase of Public Beta ~

 

What is the effect that rising's 2010 software beta activities are pursuing?

 

Deep love, responsibility must cut!

 

If you want rising to have it, you can change it!

 

 

BTW, the person of rising said something in the conversation with me, reminding me of Borland and Anders hejlsberg ), the title of the next blog post I plan to write is actually "if you compare rising to Borland Liu Xu with Anders.