Role value depends on social evaluation and personal ability

For this society, or a small point, which role is very important for a project, and the implementation of a role in one stage will affect the implementation and operation of the project.

However, the evaluation (or return) of each role in society is very important if it is only in terms of salary. Although it cannot be said that a role is important or not, the "value" of each role is determined (social demand/number of roles in society) value size-social evaluation.

Take a software designer and a product manager as an example.

If we need 10 software designers and 1 product manager, there is actually one software designer and 10 product managers. The social effect is that the supply of software products is insufficient, any product manager must be competent for the job, and the treatment will inevitably be reduced, while too few designers will bring preferential treatment.

If you need one software designer and ten product managers, there are actually 10 software designers and one product manager. The social effect is that there will be no shortage of software, the designer's treatment is reduced, and the manager's treatment is generous.

You can also adjust the supply and demand ratio of the above example.

The value above is presented by the Group. For example, the value of software designers has already been defined in the current social role, however, there are high and low values for individual roles. This level depends on personal abilities and quality improvement. It determines whether you are an outstanding or mediocre person in this role.

As an excellent person in a role group, you must possess good professional knowledge and other qualities and abilities. In these capabilities, the "Overall View" is a kind of capability that cannot be underestimated. This kind of ability is the powerful motivation for you to increase from one role to another for a role with higher social evaluation. These people may be very busy and have no time to go into details, but they can use interfaces (APIS, documents, and so on) Most. If they have time, they can study details, practice more, and read more in a certain field, prepare for pressing the time-by-class access, and use it when you pick up the interface.

Just as a software designer has learned to use frameworks and other tools, the idea is that it does not have to focus on the design and implementation of a tool, you only need to select the framework to be used based on the interface (you need to read more and practice this type of interface documentation at ordinary times), focus on the analysis of the domain business, and put the eye on the global to consider the problem, you can leave the details of the tool behind you.

In short, the value of a role is determined by the social evaluation and the ability of individuals (emphasizing the concept of hierarchy and the ability to use interfaces), while social evaluation is not transferred by the will of people, however, personal abilities can be cultivated in a targeted manner. More importantly, if a role is divided into two categories, it is a prerequisite for the role to be "expensive" (changing the role of an individual.