Selection of internal collaboration platforms of software companies (Project/bug/requirement management and user support)

The following is a selection description for the company's internal collaboration platform, which is posted for reference by the brothers in need.
 
What is the requirement of "software development collaboration platform "?
A. support Project Management, bug and user support management; B. internal announcement; C. customizable process and field; D. permission control; E. email notification and monitoring F. statistical Report and export G. best scalability

The selection result after a crazy query is: "urtracker + Excel ". 0321 update: "mantis + Excel" is the Final Solution. Considering the charge for urtracker, it is not enough to promote it to five accounts across the company.

The specific operation mode is: use Excel for project planning, task breakdown, record assignment, and progress summary; Use urtracker for Task Assignment and progress feedback/tracking. The effect of "Classification/Combination" can be used to perform the drop-down and collapse of tasks like the project, and the effect of statistical analysis can be easily achieved through "pivot table. There is no need to use projects. Common functions are nothing more than those. Excel is very useful without such a huge and boring stuff.

Note: The reason for selecting it is that it can easily customize processes and fields, and can also customize project management, Bug Management, and requirement management, it is incorporated into the same platform. In addition, you can see its SQL Server database, which makes it easy for you to write SQL or expandProgramTo obtain the required statistical analysis report. The Mantis field can also be customized, but the only drawback is that the process state cannot be added. It can be used to customize the process, but the status is those States and cannot be added.

Of course, "tools work with management", and the key is people. There is no corresponding idea, and even the best tools are in vain. At present, this platform has not been verified. The specific use effect will be summarized later.

Note that urtracker is charged, but a free version with five accounts can meet the needs of small teams. In the future, if you want to register an account, you can accept it for $45/account. If you must be free of charge, you can replace it with Mantis. The defect is that the process customization effect is almost the same.
 
1. urtracker:
Http://www.lealsoft.com/urtracker/
Advantages: it can meet our needs, and the operation is also in line with the domestic habits. In addition, it is done by. NET + SQL, which can be easily expanded on its own. (Internal announcements can be replaced by the knowledge base)
Disadvantage: billing. (But a free version with five accounts)

2. Mantis:
Www.mantisbt.org/
If you want to use free software, this is the case. In addition to the Process status, project management can only be implemented as a bug project. This may not be a great compromise.

3. http://at.tryphpgroupware.org/phpgroupware/login.php
Advantage: supports project management, bug, and internal announcement. (The process and custom fields are unknown ). In addition, there are many integrated functional modules, such as calendar, forum, and Wiki. Open source is free of charge. Overseas open source will continue to upgrade.
Disadvantages: The operation habits are not so good. In addition, PHP + MySQL is used for expansion, which is difficult.

4. http://egroupware.outdoor-training.de/egw-head/login.php
Advantage: supports project management, bug, and internal announcement. (Does the process and custom fields seem to be unavailable ?). In addition, there are many integrated functional modules, such as calendar, forum, and Wiki. Open source is free of charge. Overseas open source will continue to upgrade.
Disadvantages: The operation habits are not so good. In addition, PHP + MySQL is used for expansion, which is difficult.

5. sawin2006 R & D collaboration platform
Http://www.sawin.cn/OpenProject/sawin2006/welcome.htm
The interface and process do not meet our requirements.
Supports requirement management and Bug Management. Open source.

6. bugfree:
Http://bugfree.1zsoft.com/Demo/
The function is simple and cannot meet the needs of project management. The advantage is that the interface design is clear. It is still possible to manage bugs. Of course, I personally feel that mantis is used to it.

7. https://gforge.org/
It may be more suitable for open-source software with unknown results. Supports project management and Bug Management.

8. Jira:
It is said that it can also support project management and bugs, and it can also be, but it is charged (free for open-source projects ). See
Http://blog.csdn.net/judyxm/archive/2006/04/26/678456.aspx

9. There should be other paid software. No longer found here.
Http://www.php-open.com/some open source software.

Finally, we recently found that Windows SharePoint Services 3.0 seems to be able to meet all requirements, and it seems quite good. However, it is too large to maintain the service. See here: http://www.cnblogs.com/cleo/archive/2007/03/16/SharePointV3_Templates_Demo.html