[Software life] about peer competition, you need to know that you need to focus on follow-up

In yesterday's peer competition between me and iSoftStone's smart company, the opposing lawyer insisted on one:

The business license of two companies is registered on the same operating scope, so there is a prohibition of peer competition.

Completely ignoring the two companies in two completely different industries, the product completely different facts, insisted that I compensate more than 500,000 yuan peer competition prohibition compensation.

At the end of the day, Huang, a lawyer at the Pacific law firm, suddenly remembered one thing and said to the arbitrator that the claims I had mentioned in the last complaint had been sent to me, the same as I had mentioned in the complaint.

I asked him, then why did you insist that the company suspected that I use smart money to reimburse the green net business trip so I do not reimburse me.

' I don't know what the company is, ' he said smiled guiltily.

This is the so-called inference that he produced in a moment of emotion, which is actually a malicious speculation or an insult to my personal reputation, and now it is a shame to use this excuse to stall.

However, it is important for All programmers to be aware that precedents have an impact on judgments. In other words, if I lose, we will be job-hopping, as long as there are competitors to prohibit the agreement signed, regardless of whether the other side to pay you, you can only sell roasted sweet potatoes for more than two years to return to the software industry work.

[Software life] about peer competition, you need to know that you need to focus on follow-up