Software process and project Management 7th week job drive and responsibility
Read the drive and responsibility article to discuss how the team can make everyone clear about drivers and responsibilities.
Article Link: http://www.cnblogs.com/xinz/p/4298446.html
There is an extreme view that any performance evaluation linked to remuneration is harmful, what do you think?
Article Link: http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000070.html
Answer: 1. The team is a group of people with a common goal, the team members have their own division of labor, mutual reliance on cooperation, work together to complete the task. How to achieve the team goals step-by-step, and what to use to drive the team members can continue, long-lasting investment, efforts are inseparable. And let the team members have something to do, clear their role in the team and positioning, there is a sense of belonging, to be able to devote themselves or participate in the project rather than onlookers, which is inseparable from the responsibility of the team members themselves. So the team wants everyone to have a clear drive and responsibility. It is mentioned in the article that traditional software companies are driven by salaries, jobs, performance evaluations, etc., while the dream-breaking code suggests that it is better to drive with open source, community, and sharing (market mode). Both of these driving styles have advantages and disadvantages, the cathedral model is more common, because now in this society, people not only have dreams, want to succeed, but also to consider the reality, so the salary, position, performance appraisal this drive way is undoubtedly very effective. The advantage of the market model is that interested people can benefit, can drive to do better, and shortcomings as mentioned in the article "obligation" this point, because "obligation", you cannot ask for anything, so "lack of control". I think the most important driver is the team of everyone's heart is a piece of, can also say that a group of like-minded people, everyone has to achieve the goal of the project heart, which is very important to drive. Responsibility is also important and inseparable from the drive, the article mentions the delay, the delay has not received any punishment, then the next delay will still appear. If it can be effectively driven, everyone's sense of responsibility will not be too low.
2. The assertion that any performance evaluation linked to remuneration is harmful is too partial and too focused on the shortcomings of the pay performance evaluation: it is not conducive to the mobilization of enthusiasm, tune, you think that the fair salary distribution, the salaried people may not feel fair, so that the enthusiasm is even worse. However, this assessment is not all harmful, after all, we all need money to support each of our lives. Since everyone needs money, it is also a good way to drive if you have high performance and a higher salary.
Software process and project management week seventh work