Software Testing-Peer review

Peer review (peer review)

Peer review (peer review, also known in some academic fields)) is a review process in which an author's academic work or plan is reviewed by other experts and scholars in the same field. In the publishing unit mainly peer-reviewed method to select and screening of the delivered manuscript acceptance or not, and the funds provided by the unit, but also in a peer-reviewed manner to determine whether the grant of research fellowships.

The peer-reviewed process is focused on making the author's work conform to the standards of the general scientific and disciplinary field. The publication of books in many fields, or the awarding of research bonuses, may be controversy if not conducted in a peer-reviewed manner. Peer review mechanisms are seen by many countries as the focus of scientific research, and almost all well-known journals are peer-reviewed, believing that peer review will ensure the quality of the published research. One of the reasons for peer review is that it is difficult to identify all errors and flaws in complex work by individual authors or by the strength of a single research team. This is not because the flaws are like undersea needles, but for the new eclectic knowledge product, some experts are able to identify opportunities for improvement. It is therefore easier to expose your work to others, to get advice and encouragement and eventually to be corrected. Keeping the identity of the reviewer and the reviewer two-way secret and independent can effectively prevent cliquish problems in the financial and publishing, in order to try to be as honest as possible and criticize them. In addition, because reviewers are often selected experts in the field of the article, peer review is considered the key to academic research and the creation of reliable learning. Post-publication-oriented academic readers are only a limited area of expertise, they need peer review to some extent to ensure the reliability of the results of the study, and then on the basis of these findings on the follow-up or related research activities. Thus, if the author is found to be false in the article, it is often considered a major scandal, as many other researchers, as well as the field of study itself, have relied on the results of the study. Review process: When publishing a publication, the editor sends a copy of further work or concepts to that field expert. Generally through e-mail or Network manuscript processing system to complete. Usually an article is examined by two to three persons. Most articles after the review process may have the following results: unconditional acceptance of the manuscript, or the article, accept the manuscript However, on some points of view, the author must be further enhanced, to withdraw the manuscript, but to encourage the revision of the manuscript and then re-submit, directly withdraw the manuscript. In this process, the reviewer is the role of the consultant and the editor adopts the opinion of the reviewer without formal restraint. Furthermore, in the course of publication of scientific publications, the assessors do not appear in a team form, they do not communicate with each other and do not know each other, and usually do not ask the reviewer to reach a consensus. As a result, the group operates differently from the jury. Under normal circumstances, although the reviewers have no agreement on the quality of the subjects, there are still several ways to find a relatively consistent decision.

Software Testing-Peer review