Solve the puzzle of SEO learning "outside the chain + article" is not the whole of thinking

Recently with some friends in the line to talk into SEO, found that a lot of peers stop in the "outside is outside the chain, the station is the update of the article" thinking layer. I also want to optimize whether SEO only stay in the "chain + article" level.

The answer is certainly denied, if only stay in the "chain + article" In fact, SEO practitioners can easily reach the learning of the bottle strength. With the SEO industry more and more people intervene, competition is bound to intensify. There are a few days to read a book, "Thinking Technology: Thinking to determine competitiveness," a major emphasis on one of the most basic way of thinking: Suppose a validation,. Suppose one validates and draws a conclusion. This is the most basic and most common way of thinking in scientific research, which makes us realize that we should focus on logical thinking, strengthen the training of daily thinking, and really improve our thinking ability.

In fact, do SEO need this ability to think more. For example, the log will show all the behavior of spiders, through the log analysis can know the basic situation of the site, which requires data analysis capabilities.

For example, the collection is not ideal, because the structure of the site, or the quality of the article issues. It may be that you are forbidden from robots.txt. The reason behind all this is the ability to think.

For example, the ranking is off because of the chain factor or the factor in the station. More is the need to find the reason behind this essence, not rely on guessing. By guessing SEO is able to optimize, may be the composition of luck will need to occupy a big ratio.

In fact, outside the chain, the article these are just like the way, rather than the nature of the reasons. The essence of the reason is the need for data support, but also need the breadth of their knowledge. Again, the common sense of the HTTP1.1 agreement. The following figure is the simulation of Google crawl page.

"Figure 1"

As we can see, spiders actually crawl not only with your content, but also with your HTTP headers. That is the spider crawled these, that these will have an impact on SEO, of course, the answer is yes.

"Figure 2"

We can see that spiders actually crawl in three ways, Head,post,get. Can be clearly seen through the log. At the same time, in fact, through the analysis of the log, you can know that JS, CSS spiders are crawled. These analyses are derived from the journal, and if you know how to analyze the log, many of the market arguments are not interesting.

At the same time, SEO practitioners should have a certain degree of programming (non-HTML), because so you can from the search engine perspective to think about a lot of problems, so you can get the same analytical conclusions. For example: Do you know whether plain text is good or anchor text is good. If you're in the program, you'll think that this requires a statistical analysis of statistics. And how the program should determine the relevance of a page. To draw their own case, not a quarrel.

Generally speaking, SEO does is a knowledge breadth; SEO is a logical thinking process, and "outside the chain + article" is not the whole of thinking; SEO is a process of adjustment, so need to have the corresponding data analysis, statistical capacity.

The above is only a personal point of view, the transfer please specify the source of seo:http://blog.passseo.com/?p=47 thank A5 to provide Exchange platform!