Some opinions of seo original articles

My views on the original article of the seo tutorial

First, the search engine cannot identify the so-called originality. I personally think that the search engine cannot identify the so-called originality. Therefore, it does not really make sense to emphasize the original content of the article. In fact, whether an article is original or not. Sometimes it is related to who is first indexed. I believe many webmasters will often find that sometimes the original articles they have worked hard to write are not necessarily indexed, however, this article has been indexed after others reposted. If this article is reposted many times and indexed many times, the so-called originality may not be indexed, it is not until the weight of your website reaches a certain level that you have the opportunity to be indexed. Some webmasters may say that they can be determined based on the captured time, but this is not fair, and sometimes it cannot be fully implemented. I personally think that only when the website has a certain weight can the original article be meaningful. At the same time, the original article should also have a meaning, that is, the content that appears is relatively fresh, there are not many articles reposted on the internet. For example, if you repost a relatively fresh article, the possibility of being indexed is greatly increased, and the search engine will recognize it to some extent.

Second, do pseudo-originality make sense? I personally think this is not the case. Some people on the Internet wrote a lot of articles on how to make pseudo-originality, cited the title change, and changed the first and last sections, there are also a variety of methods such as smooth adjustment, and some people have proposed the splicing method to do pseudo-originality. In the past, there were tools to do pseudo-originality. I personally think this is not very significant, search engines can now be effectively recognized, which is related to the working principle of search engines and word segmentation technology. In my opinion, if a word is segmented from an article, then sum up the number and proportion of these words, and then the search engine will judge these words to see if there are many articles with similar proportions. That is to say, the search engine has a standard, I think that the similarity is Replication. Of course, this is my personal idea. I always wanted to test it. Unfortunately, there is no condition. I hope someone can test it. According to my personal point of view, the adjustment is smooth, and it doesn't make much sense to change the title. The most important thing is to adjust the proportion of some words or replace some words, but to maintain the readability of the article, this is better.

Third: original articles with low quality are not like reposted articles with excellent quality. Do not think that the original article is king, the most important thing is quality. I personally think that if the original quality is not high, it is not like a repost with high quality. This is also proved.

Fourth, the longer the article is, the higher the probability of being recognized. Many may find that if some reposted articles are long and short, they are more likely to be indexed than an original article, which may be caused by a factor in the search engine algorithm, as a matter of fact, many experts have also said that, instead of updating low-quality content every day, it is better to publish an article of excellent quality in a week, even a reprinted article.