Some Questions about the workflow web designer

For a long time, many of my friends have asked for a web version of the Process designer. I also do my best to provide some, but the web version of the Process designer is a required module for many business process systems, if I
Mature web designer provides free download and sharing CodeThis may facilitate the majority of workflow enthusiasts, but it is not a good thing for the whole industry of process management software. After all, a function is developed.
A complete process management system requires a lot of manpower and time. If we are doing open source software, we will continue to compete with commercial enterprises for products in this respect, obviously, this is not an option that is conducive to the health of the entire industry.
Continue to develop.
Java

Open-source software and commercial software should collaborate and support each other in an industry, rather than directly competing, open-source software has played an important role in promoting low-cost entry into this field.
But its negative effects are also constantly emerging. The threshold for this field is getting lower and lower, and competitors are increasing. As a result, product prices are constantly decreasing and enterprise costs are constantly increasing, making profit margins in this field constantly
Enterprises are increasingly reluctant to invest capital and resources in upgrading and developing process systems, leading to technical stagnation in this field, in addition to continuing investment in national research projects on Process Management
Besides (I have seen continuous scientific research papers in this area), Chinese enterprises seem to have no new movements in this regard, and there are no new hot spots to claim, there are no new innovations, and the process management field may still exist.
There are a lot of problems that need to be solved, but the investment of enterprises in this field should never be stagnant ....

The road ahead is still difficult and long... It is obviously not enough for us to be open-source individuals ....