Stable and easy-to-use Linux Desktop System

Before giving you a detailed introduction to the Linux desktop system, first let everyone know about Fedora and then give a comprehensive introduction to the Linux Desktop System. If you believe that the Linux Desktop advocates cannot objectively analyze the desktop OS, read this article.

The three Linux desktop systems have some commendable advantages. I am lucky to have the opportunity to learn how they work, there are currently some unbiased ideas for users who use and Program on these three platforms. Background: I have several Macintosh computers, including various models. I still remember the conversion from OS9 to OS X. I have used MicroSoft products from DOS to Windows XP and various operating systems of IBM and NetWare.

In my daily work, I use SUSE SLES and Pro, RHEL, Fedora, Debian and Ubuntu on servers and workstations. Each operating system has its own programming system. OS is more like a Linux desktop system than Windows. Compared with OS, Windows and linux have completely different programming structures. Windows relies more on its graphical interface. Windows XP uses the NT kernel to manage the file system and communicates with the graphic interface. OS X and Linux use completely different kernel extensions and independent programs to run in Shell on the user interface. UNIX shell runs in what the kernel developer calls userland. UNIX and Linux developers think that their development methods are better than Windows, while Windows developers think that Windows provides faster interface extension and rapid program development. Objectively speaking, each type has its own advantages.

As a personal application, I use a Mac computer to develop graphics, audio products, and development websites. I have never restarted my computer at work, and it also allows me to use InterNet applications that have never been used before in Unix. Windows xp I remember I had been using XP for three months without restarting it. XP is more secure due to its firewall. After three months, the system becomes more slow, and common operations such as disk fragmentation, file deletion, and registry check are hard to maintain. I like XP better than Windows. Compared with the comparison of the three operating systems, I have integrated the survey, analysis reports and personal experience. I have a preference for free software, but I will ensure the objectivity of this comparison. For developers and administrators, Ubuntu is a good replacement for Linux desktop and Unix. Compared with 11.4% of the Linux desktop market owned by SUSE, Ubuntu occupies 25% of the market share. Therefore, this comparison uses Ubuntu as a representative of the Linux Desktop System. Like all Linux systems, Ubuntu has some restrictions. It lacks some common applications in Windows. Therefore, Ubuntu is only a medium-level Linux Desktop System. When using Linux to develop a Web Service, the application will find that it has many advantages, and does not require high hardware configuration and memory overhead. I can use MB of memory to achieve the effect of 1 GMB on other operating systems. In addition, Ubuntu has a good desktop and can be suitable for end users and enterprise users. Home users will find it a stable and easy-to-use operating system. Windows XP provides an appropriate operating system to gather a large number of independent software developers who use Win32API to develop their own commercial software.

XP is pre-installed on products of various PC manufacturers except Apple. A relatively high retail price and a very low OEM price make it appear on a large number of PCs. Since the release of XP, Microsoft has provided a series of security patches and Service packs. As a development platform, Windows XP is not as disappointing as Linux, Macintosh, and UNIX. Microsoft's development tools can only run on Windows platforms and do not provide compatibility with other platforms. But XP users are not worried about this. The installation of Windows software is based on the assumption that most people know how to use the Windows system, so there is a gap with other systems. However, a large number of Microsoft Certified System Engineers can solve all possible problems, and they feel that there is no need to switch to other systems. In addition to the fact-aware publicity campaign, cost saving is meaningless for Microsoft. Macintosh OS X can only run under limited hardware, but Apple has a powerful and stable system environment. Apple's high-end models, such as Power Mac G5, provide excellent performance for graphics and multimedia users. Powerbook is also popular among developers and writers.

In the PC industry, Apple remains the main source of innovation. Many users are willing to pay for Apple's performance and innovation. Although the lack of software on Apple has caused many criticism, the situation has improved significantly. OS X includes Adobe's series of software and Microsoft's efficiency suite, along with some free software and multiple media players. Among intermediate computer users, Apple's Macintosh is not as popular as V. Only users who can afford it can enjoy apple. In education, Macintosh OS X and Microsoft Windows XP are more widely used than Linux. Unless more efforts are made by common hardware vendors and independent software vendors for Linux, the market share of desktop computers will not change.

However, for the two vendors, such efforts are at great risk. Because the Linux desktop community tends to use free software, software vendors may not be able to reclaim the costs of research and development. In addition, the short update cycle of Linux desktop systems is also one of the reasons for the manufacturers to be discouraged. Even with these solutions, vendors cannot determine whether the Linux Desktop System will evolve to replace the Windows desktop system. However, software products provided by Adobe and Intuit are likely to make Linux take this step. Some companies have tried this risk on Unix and have been defeated. As a result, Windows is still dominated by desktop systems. Macintosh continues to provide services for visitors, while Ubuntu continues to play the role of intermediate desktop systems and developer platforms. References: http://ks.cn.yahoo.com/question/1406111924790.html

1. Development of Linux desktop system developers seeking for the same purpose
2. Six advantages of Linux Desktop System
3. Who is ups and downs in the Linux Desktop System?
4. Linux desktop system becomes a butterfly
5. Microsoft: Linux desktop systems already pose a threat