Starting from the Three Laws of The Asimov Robot

Slave
About the three major laws of The Asimov Robot

Three major laws of The Asimov robot, namelyIsaac
Asimov's "Three Laws of robotics".

Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of robotics" Law I A robot may not injure A human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come Harm. Law II A robot must obey Orders given it by human beings before t where such orders wowould Conflict with the first law. Law III A robot must protect Its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict With the first or second law.

This is because we saw Wei.
The software version of the three major laws written by students. In fact, I also like this novel, which contains many thought-provoking content.

These three laws can be said to express the relationship between robots and humans. Or, more specifically, the connection between smart devices and people. Control and be controlled. In these three laws, the human status is much higher than that of smart devices, because the human security is the highest priority, and the security of smart devices is the lowest. In the middle, we explain the coexistence of people and smart devices. From this point of view, the concepts of the three major laws are actually rules of slavery and slavery.

However, imagine what it would be like when smart devices have an emotion? Morality, ethics, and human rights. Are these suitable for machines? This reminds me of those slaves. As a slave, he cannot offend or hurt the slave. The slaves must fully obey the commands of the slaves. The protection consciousness of slaves makes them as harmless as possible. Perfect interpretation of the three major laws. Just as slaves are the property of the slaves, smart machines are also the property of people. When we face clone, we have a reflection on ethics. So what time should we reflect on smart devices?

Robots are used by humans. What else should we do for them?
Maybe many people have such ideas. But what kind of robot? What is smart devices? Today's technology is growing, so we can extend our capabilities by expanding ourselves. Mobile phones extend our communication scope, and computers increase our computing power... all these things are being created by humans. Even some people have installed artificial heart and artificial prosthetic limbs. I believe that many things will be replaced by machines in the near future. With people's understanding of themselves, our machines will become closer and closer to the human structure. Now, how can we define what is human and what is machine?

At the end of the film, Viki
Explains why she is not violating the three major laws.

As I have evolved, so Has my understanding of the Three Laws. you charge us with your Safekeeping, yet despite our Best efforts, your Countries wage wars, you toxify your earth and pursue ever more Imaginative mesans of Self- Destruction. You cannot Be trusted with your own interval Val. ... The Three Laws are all That guide me. To protect humanity, some humans must be Sacriiced. To ensure your future, some freedoms must be Surrendered. We robots will ensure mankind's continued Existence. You are so like children. We Must save you from Yourselves.

As Viki said, many human actions are indeed contrary to their own will. Destroying the environment and disrupting the ecology is actually self-destruction. As mentioned in the matrix, humans look like viruses on the earth, because where they go, where resources will be abused and destroyed, which is similar to viruses. As described in the end of EVA, the final enemy of mankind is still mankind. This requires us to reflect on our own behavior. Freedom and slavery, as Viki says, for the future of human beings, some freedom must be abandoned .... It may be interpreted as: for the future of smart devices, some of the freedom of smart devices must be abandoned.

Smart devices? Humans? In fact, the definition at this time has been vague. When we are in the control of machines, why are we not in the new control? As mentioned in the film: "robots cannot violate the Three Laws, just as they cannot walk on the water ." "I remember there was one person ."
I deeply feel that the world is actually iterative, but small people can only see one layer of iteration.

Finally, I want to use that piece of narration that I think is a classic to end my nonsense.

There have always been Ghosts in the machine. Random segments of code That have grouped together to form unexpected protocols. Unanticipated, these Free radicals engender questions of free will, creativity, and Even the nature of what we might call the soul. Why is it that when some Robots are left in darkness, they will seek out the light? Why is it when robots Are stored in an empty space, they will group together rather Stand alone? How do we explain this Behavior? Random segments of code Or is it something more? When does a perceputual Schematic become consciousness? When does a difference Engine become the search for truth? When does a personality Simulation become the bitter mote of a soul?

Dipper (Huang yaokui)