The general SEO opinion is that static pages are conducive to SEO, so a lot of SEO is generated to reconstruct the website pages, and you have to make your website a pseudo static URL to increase your SEO effect. However, SEO has been developing for several years. In the past, static data can be used to achieve great results, but is it still useful?
First, dynamic websites have better experience than static websites because information is updated quickly. The most important thing for search engines is the search user experience.
The second search engine has a low update frequency, and Baidu Spider visits on asp pages are much more frequent than html.
The third seo is to improve the ranking of your website in the search engine. I am afraid it is a fact that every SEO recognizes, but it does not have much advantage now.
Fourth, with the development of search engine technology, especially google's proficiency in dynamic code indexing, the technical level has completely reached the indexing html capability, and there is no difference.
Fifth, the hmtl page also decreases with the increase of time.
The sixth html page does not allow you to add more entries.
Seventh, please do not underestimate the strength of search engines. Is it true that the development of search engines has not exceeded "?" Is this symbol an obstacle? Still think static is easier to capture?