Talking about Java interview

Today's programmers interview, most of the test is a theory, rarely encountered to let you on the machine. And as I and my friends have encountered, difficulties are mainly found in the following situations.
One is to treat you as an English genius. Interview topics are all English, and involved in a very wide range of knowledge, in general, only the key universities in high school students can be Atti, but I think most of these people have gone to graduate. Such topics usually appear in companies with a registered asset of more than 100 million per cent, and it is understandable that they will grow up as good employees. But they think programmers who have worked more than a year can do it easily, and at least some of them can handle it. So when you are ambitious to apply before, please see how your strength (over six or four grade 80 points above, professional courses on average more than 80 people can try).
The second is to treat you as a master of the Java language (theoretically). Now the online popular big company face test may have some people have seen, I used Java for nearly two years, since I think the qualification is not weak, but the topic to get hands after the feeling is holding your breath. Many places just have a vague concept, the answer is not complete, look up the data can be answered. Maybe my foundation is still a little weak, but when I try to "talk" to the person interviewing me on the question, I find out that he knows the answer to the question. For example, the question is whether the interface can inherit the interface, and I ask him if the interface can extend the interface. In theory, the familiar interface concept should be able to answer the.
The third is to treat you as a compiler. Most of the exam topics are read the program to write results, or to find errors, and so on, but many are compiled exceptions, if you have an IDE, you must be easy to handle, but you do not have the opportunity to answer that you do not know the actual operation experience (others think so). While it is true that programmers should have mastered this, it seems a bit sweeping. Usually busy doing projects, free time to learn new technology, who will have the kind of idle to study Java can run this way.
Four is the only theory of experience. A 10-page paper, he only needs to watch a two minutes on the OK, and then come and talk to you. The main question is what has been done in the past, and of course the more you say, the better (not too exaggerated). This kind of interview is usually the manager or boss, because you can answer the things they do not understand: so lazy to read. If you have done a project, then the appropriate, implicit exaggeration point you have done, the attitude is good, while the demand for wages should not be too high, the market price can be. I can only offer deep sympathy to those who have no experience or experience. But if you are good at it, you should have no problem fooling such a boss.
Summing up some of the success of the interview elements can know that there are probably four kinds.
One is the strength, can be divided into the actual operation of the ability and theoretical knowledge. There is little on the machine, but there is no doubt that if you are strong under the IDE, you have strong confidence. Confidence is not necessarily a good thing, but no self-confidence must not, I think most people think so. The theory of things you can spend a bit of time system research, but how to calculate the system. I do not know, I was "java2 core technology" read two times.
The second is the attitude, the attitude is simply the interview skills problem, your actual attitude is not important, it is important how to let him think you are good, is a "sensible" good boy. Whether the future is good management is the boss of a class of people who care most.
Three is experience, this has nothing to say, in general experience more, the ability is stronger. If he asked for a low salary, of course, it would be a priority. That's what small companies usually think.
Four is luck, I have classmates, after graduating from college in Guangzhou for two months did not find a job, the main reason is almost, coupled with no experience, written examinations, interviews are not. But one time he went to apply for, the written answer, was the technician to give him an interview, the manager just came. Asked him where he was, the university has no make-up, and so on, five minutes later let him come to work next week, a monthly salary of 2500. Later he understood, the manager employed his reason is very simple, my classmate is Anhui people, the manager contacted Anhui people give him the impression is very good, what steadfast, willing to dry, hard work. In short, Anhui people have priority. But how do I feel the main reason is "more obedient".

After all, there is really no effective way to select talents, so it will happen. Depressed I have to continue to work hard.