Ten good reason to use latex

These are the reasons most often cited for using Tex, grouped into four areas: output quality, superior engineering, freedom, and popularity.

• Output Quality you write your ents to be read. Your first concern shoshould be: How good is the output?

• 1) Tex has the best output. What you end with, the symbols on the page, is as useable, and beautiful, as a non-professional can produce.

  This is especially holds for complex documents such as ones with mathematics; see this sample from Rogers'sRecursive functions. It also holds for documents that are complex in other ways: With your tables, or your cross references or hyper-links, or just with your pages.

  Even on simple procesents Tex does a better job than a word processor. Compare these samples of plain text from herigel'sZen in the art of archeryDone in the word processorWord, And Tex. these are short and the typographic differences are subtle but even a non-expert will have the sense that the Tex page looks better. for instance, the word processor's page has some lines with wide gaps between words and some lines with too into words stuffed in; contrast the second paragraph's second line with its third. tex's output is better.

• 2) Tex knows typesetting. As those plain text samples show, Tex's has more sophisticated typographical algorithms such as those for making paragraphs and for hyphenating.

  Tex's expertise comes into its own in setting technical material. tex moves this task, as much as possible, into the software. for instance, it automatically classifies each mathematical symbol as a variable, or a relation, Etc ., and sets them with appropriate amounts of surrounding space. it also sizes superscripts and subscripts, radicals, brackets, and other things. the result is that, because your document follows the conventions of professional typesetting, your readers will know exactly what you mean. you almost never have to fret with the formulas. they just come out looking right.

The quality of output is the best reason to use Tex.

• Superior engineering everyone has been frustrated with software that is slow, fat, buggy, or that undergoes frequent Incompatible version changes. tex will not give you those troubles; from a computer science standpoint, Tex is very impressive.

• 3) Tex is fast. On today's machines Tex is very fast. It is easy on memory and disk space, too.

• 4) Tex is stable. It is in wide use, with a long history. It has been tested by millions of users, on demaning input. It will never eat your document. Never.

  But there is more here than just that the program is reliable. Tex's designer has frozen the central engine, the actualtexProgram. Documents that run today will still run in ten years, or shortty. So "stable" means more than that it actually works. It means that it will continue to work, forever.

• 5) Tex is stable, but not rigid. A system locked into 1978's technology wocould today have gaps. That's why Tex is extendable, so that innovations can be added on.

  An example is the latex macro package, which is the most popular way to use Tex today. it extends Tex by adding conveniences such as automatic cross references, sectioning, indexing, a table of contents, automatic numbering of chapters, sections, theorems, Etc ., in a variety of styles, and a straightforward but powerful way to make tables.

  Latex also contains {features that encourage authors to structure documents by meaning rather than by appearance. For instance, a latex author might indicate an acronym"the /ac{Tree Based Hashing} method. "This approach has two advantages. First, since/acIs run by a computer and not hand-entered by a person, we can rely on type style, size, etc ., being the same throughout the document; in this case the first time the acronym is used in the paper it will appear as "tree based hashing (tbh) "While in later times" tbh "will be all that is shown. second, once information on the meaning is in the computer then we can do more with it, perhaps by producing an index of acronyms.

  And, latex itself can be extended. there are thousands of "style Files" that do everything from adapting the basics to the needs of the American math society, to making cross-references into hyper-references, all the way to allowing you to add epigraphs, the short quotations that sometimes decorate the start or end of a chapter.

• 6) The input is plain text. tex's source files are portable to any computing platform. they are compact; for instance, all of the files for my 450 page textbook and 125 page answer supplement fit easily on one floppy disk. and, they integrate with other tools such as search programs.

  Use of this type of input file stems from Tex's roots in the world of science and engineering where there is a tradition of close cooperation among colleagues. A binary input format, especially a proprietary one, is bad for cooperation: probably you have had to go through the trouble of upgrading a word processor version because coworkers upgraded and you cocould no longer read their files. with Tex systems that rarely happens-the last time that a latex release lost Evan a small amount of compatibility was in 1995.

  Another advantage of plain text is that the text may be automatically generated, for instance if it is drawn out of a database for a report. getting a word processor into that work flow is a challenge. but Tex fits right in.

  There are even ways to run Tex directly from XML input, which has people think is the standard input format of the future. so, with the Tex engine in the middle the input may be adjusted to meet your needs, and changing times.

• 7) the output can be anything. as with inputting, Tex's outputting step is separate from its typesetting. the Tex engine's results can be converted to a printer language such as postscript or to PDF or HTML, Or, probably, to whatever will appear in the future. and, the typesetting-line breaks, etc. -will be the same no matter where your output appears. (Did you know that word processing output d Epends on the printer's fonts, so that if you email your work to someone with a different printer then for them the line and page breaks are likely to come out differently ?)

Please people find that Tex's input language fits with how they think about their material. For instance, a scientist might describe a formula to a colleague over a telephone using Tex constructs.

• Freedom most computer users have heard about free and open-sourced software and know that, as with the GNU programs, Linux, Apache, Perl, Etc ., this style of development can yield software that is first class. tex systems fall into this category.

• 8) Tex is free. The source of the maintexEngine is open; the Free Software Foundation uses it for their documents. All of the other main components are open, also.

• 9) Tex runs anywhere. Whatever platform meets your needs-Windows, Macintosh, a variety of UNIX, or almost anything else-you can get Tex, either freely distributed or in a few cial version.

So although the core of Tex was written some time ago it fits well with today's trends.

• Popularity using the same system as your other people has advantages. for instance, you can get answers to your questions. and, because of this large user base, your system is sure to be around for years.

• 10) Tex is the standard. most scientists, especially academic scientists, know Tex. research preprints, drafts of textbooks, and conference proceedings, all are regularly produced with Tex. as a result, publish publishers of technical material are set up to work with it.

  Because it is the standard, Tex's support by other technical software is the best. for example, there are editing modes to make input convenient, such as auctex for Emacs. another example is that all major computer algebra systems, such as sage, maxima, Etc ., will give output in Tex. and no doubt technical software developed in the future will support Tex.

  In addition, Tex is used by province people outside of the sciences, for all of the reasons given in this document. For instance, there is a way to produce beautiful critical edition texts.

Having to use a bad system simply because it is popular wocould be sad. But nonetheless, the existence of such a base is itself one argument in favor of a software package.