Test and Evaluation of browser Performance

The ability to evaluate the browser's performance cannot be judged only by the words you experience, and the data can be used for vertical and horizontal comparison. In order to determine which browser to come out, it is superior to other browsers in terms of performance.
First, describe my computer configuration: The system is Windows XP professional service pack 2, Intel (R) Core (TM) 2 Duo CPU T8100 2.10Hz 2.09 Ghz 2.00GB memory.
The following browsers participated in the evaluation include: International google chrome16.0.912.15, firefox8.0, Internet Exploer8.0, and Opera 11.52, as well as the popular official version of 360 browser 4.0, sougou Browser 3.0, and QQ browser 6.7.
I can't wait.
This test is mainly conducted from the user's perspective. The main test is as follows: the browser supports HTML5, the memory occupied by running a Web browser, the browser's support for javascript, the hard disk capacity occupied by the browser after installation, the number of skin replaceable browsers and the number of extensible plug-ins.
1. html5 support. Mainly through the http://www.html5test.com/to test, the total score of 450 points. (The higher the score, the better)
 


By comparing the above seven browsers with HTML5 support, we can see that Google-chrome has the best support for HTML5, far exceeding some IE kernel browsers.
2, in the browser is only open the http://www.csdn.net/memory occupied (do not open all kinds of plug-ins) as follows :( the smaller the number, the better)

 

By comparing the memory occupied by a Web page, we can see that Google chrome is still not dominant, and sougou browser accounts for the least memory. Note that firefox, Internet Exploer, opera, and 360 browsers only generate one process, and the other three browsers generate two or more processes.
3. The javascript test is mainly based on the http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/data/benchmarks/v6/run.html, and the result is the main basis: (the higher the score, the better)
 

This test site was developed by google, so it can be seen that Google chrome is more dominant in javascript support than other browsers. And the advantage is obvious.
4. After the browser is installed on the computer, the size of the hard disk has just been installed.) (The smaller the number, the better)

After being installed in different browsers, the hard disk space occupied by the computer clearly shows that Google chrome occupies the largest disk capacity. In this regard, Google chrome needs to optimize its own browser.
5. Number of replaceable skins in the browser and number of extensible plug-ins (excluding applications): (the larger the number, the better)

After the browser supports HTML5, the memory occupied by running a Web browser, the browser's support for javascript, the hard disk capacity occupied by the browser after installation, the number of skin replaceable browsers, and the number of extensible plug-ins you can set the total weight to 100, as the most important thing for browsers is to adapt to future technological developments, the five weights are as follows:

Then, the browser data comparison is obtained based on each weight.

Through the above data analysis, we can clearly see that Google chrome ranks first, but we also see that Google chrome's disadvantage is that it occupies memory space and hard disk space during runtime. Other technologies have great advantages.
In addition, Google chrome has one advantage: the browser interface is concise and refreshing, but other browsers can also achieve this function after changing the interface.
The content above is mainly compared from the user's perspective, while Google chrome's built-in tools are also advantageous from the developer's perspective.
Compared with Google chrome, Google chrome is still advantageous in terms of browsers. However, if it can absorb the advantages of other browsers, especially when optimizing the runtime, the memory space and hard disk capacity will be better.
Expect Google chrome to play a greater role in the future browser market

 

The author does not care