The absurd theory of the so-called "poor learning management, technology for the rich"

Managing computers is like managing people

The meaning of human existence is to do things, but a person can do things is limited, so there are more people together to do common things, but because people are unstable, if not to limit, will be wrong, so the manager was born, and the manager, first of all, he will do things, to qualify as a manager, Arranging other people to do things for themselves, become managers, what to do is to communicate with others, in this way to let others replace their own purposes, and the meaning of the computer is the same thing, and it can handle more things than people, as long as there is more powerful performance, these performance can be replaced by hardware to achieve , so it can be understood that the limitations are smaller than people, then we assume the computer as "human", this "person" can replace people to do things, can do what kind of things by software such tools to decide, then the operation to do is to arrange the computer to do things, this is the real computer manager to do, and the low-level operation is through the computer to do their own work, this is the so-called technology, the real operators and computers to communicate with the computer to do their own work; So, computer managers and human managers are essentially managers, so the so-called poor learning technology, the rich learn to manage this sentence, for computer administrators, Naturally, it does not apply.

The absurd theory of the so-called "poor learning management, technology for the rich"