Working for three years, the workplace is frustrated. Something worth saying or not worth saying is too lazy to record. Helpless, more when helpless. The pride or conceit of the heart is not worth showing off. Born proud, or just a cry inside of oneself. After all, a proud person will not speak out, and it seems to be a bit like.
The book belongs to the story. To talk about the events of the past.
Weekend on duty, and ran into a line off the line to stop mail inexplicably lost out. In addition, recently, the database automatically dropped the session high mail, may have some kind of connection. The narrative unfolds from the following angles.
First, the user face.
There is no regular phone call, simply stop the line mail. See after the first reaction when confirmed, according to several times this kind, attention is this kind, already understood is what condition. The time from Mail (which has been stopped for 20 minutes) must have been restored. What is this for? Why prevent oneself later still have to see to see not understand to mention this kind of judgment the basis slightly.
Observation! Recording! Summarize! Reasoning.
Actually, it's not that damndest. Shop that gang, stop the mail time if there is a time gap of more than 20 minutes, then must be replaced by post-mail. Either it's still going on, or it's settled. If not, the probability of the call coming in is 80%. There is no phone call this time. The second stop line type, already has the corresponding processing unit, explained that the person who sends the stop line already has someone to wipe their buttocks again. The probability of a call coming up to 99%. There is no, the good is a limit under the inevitable. In addition to this, the attention of this kind, do not know this kind of!!! Old problems, too much processing, can be regarded as an engineer's intuition, and women to the man's sixth sense of stealing is the same. Summary, to the production line personnel, do not move the brain, have the problem to throw to other units, as long as someone tube, they alas. Say it is evil or not, but this is the typical principle of doing things, or the principle of game. Things that are not good for them, handled well, should, handled poorly, are their problems. This problem, for the normal, not through the chicken blood brain, people are tube this is the best choice after game theory.
Second, the interests of the unit.
Have to say, if this problem, who is best suited to lead the fundamental solution, the department is best. Note that the best fit is not necessarily. Where is the difference? is not what you end up solving. Like, repair the bridge to pave the road to do the project, the construction unit is negative total project success or failure? Yes. But the project quality or the construction party to do, the supervisor, the design party, the construction party and so on measures can only be indirect side. Do not cut corners, not responded. Using the new process to better quality of the completion of the project quality is the direct side of the construction party to do. Specifically, the effectiveness of the database, storage in the final analysis is not a technical problem, is not required by the DBA to do. In addition to making a series of audits, the DBA has a policy that affects the efficiency of development and does not do anything substantive. Come on, the final conclusion is not to use the database, it will not be broken. Sad!
Aside from technology, it's a deal. This issue is not the first time this has happened. The underlying rule is that multiple seesion are too high to alert the DBA, and then the CVT shuts down. This matter from the beginning, to the recovery. It is not at this level of processing at all. The bottom line here is to turn off the CVT action and notify the DBA. hehe.
In summary, what really can be done, notify the DBA, close the CVT insert operation, has been proved to be not OK. I can only do this homework. "The temple small Seet big, the pool shallow king eight many", the ancient wisdom still is said right. This kind of shameless, carefully wants completely unreasonable system incredibly can execute, and form tradition.
Since the work surface is not executed, what is left. RIP, RIP! The important thing to say three times. There is no need to mention another episode of human beings. According to the original intention, this is not directly targeted to the matter, or do not reply, why? It's not a matter of a lot less. A gentleman does not stand under a dangerous wall. Since the Ming know, do not answer, reply is a tear, that is not as good as not back. Relatively speaking, the big deal is not positive, low head past, not to be said of the matter, do not do anything against their own. However, the other said to be back, and let you back, because he did his own things, the relationship is also good. Well, all through the ages of the film species, there is always such a bridge segment. A gang of people, for one thing, an innocent lucky star under the encouragement of "eldest brother", to explore the unknown. For example, to the traitor head of the Scout Ah, ignorant teenager open a door ah. crashed! The pathfinder died and scattered away. The first lesson of today is not to be impulsive. No, that is not true. Knowingly, committed a long time to commit the wrong, repeat, cannot but say is the weakness of human nature it.
Game theory? Nonsense, often with closed eyes and a flicker of life. An understatement of the past, it became a pit. Finally fell out of the hole. Big Boss said, why not pay attention to, seriously think there has been an alarm and stop line, this is related. The most difficult lie is to deceive themselves, congratulations to the Big Boss to do. Which concludes that the session high and performance must have a relationship, the Big Boss succeeded in convincing himself, Smart criticized the head head. Yan ' an rectification Ah, team discipline AH. Oh! The perfect beating chance. Sometimes doing something is not because of it. But this time, this potential, suitable to say this matter, this is the potential also! The Art of war is about taking potential, history is also trend. The gentleman does not stand in the danger wall, the tendency is wrong, the smashing dies deserves. The trend of the world.
The head supervisor found a colleague? For Mao? I was the one who replied to the e-mail, but I found another person, organizational theory!!! Sometimes the level is a good thing, from top to bottom, strengthens the constraint. But for the small group, the wrong person is in the wrong position, double. Oh. Ego?--I was in the wrong place, that who who again wrong position ...
Write a lot, I should be able to recall the complete story paragraph, the rest of the pen. Summary, each strategy game theory rationality ranking.
The best policy: reply, external OK, internal description. Unfortunately, the latter part of the missing, immediately lost points. Unfortunately, the potential is not correct, even if the reply, but also all the area. The same thing, the same treatment, different treatment, because people are wrong, people's potential! Is it fair? Oh.
The best policy: do not reply. Since it is intricate, it will be spared. Personal style, more willing this is the best policy. No attack, no war, benevolence invincible!
The worst way: Others reply, + this reply half. The difference is different from others. Reply half, to colleague is good, pits feat! Then with the boss to discuss the world bustling, Jiangshan, hehe! Do things first, as long as put on a pair of trousers, then the poo natural people rub. On the contrary, it is to see jokes.
The worst: controversy. This is where the unnecessary arguments are necessary. Do not wear a pair of trousers, then not my race, its heart will be different. It is this kind of rhetoric to do things as well.
It's the best policy. Believe that the universe is balanced, sometimes decided that the pattern is not these inexplicable life, but the thick accumulation of thin hair change the courage!!!
In this article, I would like to pay tribute to the struggle. Choice is greater than effort, homeopathy is stronger than cling.
The experience and summary of work "accidents"--the application of game theory