Currently I have integrated dedecms and discuz successfully, members can log in and out simultaneously.
But the problem is, I want to do login and registration on the DEDECMS page, click the pop-up box using Discuz Login and registration box to log in or register, log in successfully returned DISCUZ member information (Information AH Avatar ah what a bunch).
How do you ask for specific?
Degree Niang for a long time, on-line information is very few, also said not clear.
Reply to discussion (solution)
Never met this requirement ...
But you can try ShowWindow (' login ', ' member.php?mod=logging&action=login '), link you have to change it and introduce Discuz Common.js and style ( It should be common.css)
I have not tried, not necessarily success, there is, since you can sync login and quit, why don't you dedecms this side to do a popup box, your own UC login, your dedecms and Discuz is two applications, is independent, do not recommend such a call, UC interface is used to solve the problem of multi-application sharing one user data
Never met this requirement ...
But you can try ShowWindow (' login ', ' member.php?mod=logging&action=login '), link you have to change it and introduce Discuz Common.js and style ( It should be common.css)
I have not tried, not necessarily success, there is, since you can sync login and quit, why don't you dedecms this side to do a popup box, your own UC login, your dedecms and Discuz is two applications, is independent, do not recommend such a call, UC interface is used to solve the problem of multi-application sharing one user data
Direct use of the DEDECMS landing box is feasible, but there are no cookies, there is no member information on the problem. With Dedecms login, he provided is this side of the member information, such as discuz that points just 2 points, Dede this side has more than 100 points, Dede Member Center and Discuz Member Center is also inconsistent. So it's a weird question to call discuz over there. According to my original understanding, regardless of login which system, member information should be consistent, do not know why Dede this side of the monk.
Therefore, we intend to use the DISCUZ membership system without DEDECMS membership system directly. This eliminates the differences in the various parameters.
Never met this requirement ...
But you can try ShowWindow (' login ', ' member.php?mod=logging&action=login '), link you have to change it and introduce Discuz Common.js and style ( It should be common.css)
I have not tried, not necessarily success, there is, since you can sync login and quit, why don't you dedecms this side to do a popup box, your own UC login, your dedecms and Discuz is two applications, is independent, do not recommend such a call, UC interface is used to solve the problem of multi-application sharing one user data
Direct use of the DEDECMS landing box is feasible, but there are no cookies, there is no member information on the problem. With Dedecms login, he provided is this side of the member information, such as discuz that points just 2 points, Dede this side has more than 100 points, Dede Member Center and Discuz Member Center is also inconsistent. So it's a weird question to call discuz over there. According to my original understanding, regardless of login which system, member information should be consistent, do not know why Dede this side of the monk.
Therefore, we intend to use the DISCUZ membership system without DEDECMS membership system directly. This eliminates the differences in the various parameters.
Tried, the effect is not very good, the first is the ShowWindow () function invalidation, guess is not get to the div ID. directly to the entire page to the login page, after landing the program can not find the from page, only error.
Difficult, difficult.
You can only make a login box, background with Uc_user_login to perform synchronous login
You can only make a login box, background with Uc_user_login to perform synchronous login
This difficult study to study the use of dedecms+discuz is in fact the same as using discuz alone, which is hard to do with the extensibility features of custom forms.